23981 Members
56 Forums
180980 Topics
1593762 Posts
Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1117262 - 12/21/05 09:35 AM
Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
 
|
Veteran

Registered: 02/23/02
Posts: 1525
Loc: Somewhere where I don't know w...
|
So the Harm Principle applies to swinging but not to pot, this burns!
Tjhis must be especially hard for DML
cbc.ca
Swingers clubs don't harm society, top court rules
Last Updated Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:55:08 EST
CBC News
Clubs that allow group sex and partner swapping do not harm Canadian society and should not be considered criminal, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Wednesday.
The high court, which was ruling on two Quebec cases, said Canadian standards can tolerate the activities, even when they are done amid spectators.
Interior of a Montreal swinger club
The judges, in a 7-2 ruling, said the test for indecency is the harm it causes, and not simply community standards.
The cases involve two swingers clubs in Montreal that allowed sex acts, including swapping.
One case involved James Kouri, owner of a club called Coeur a Corps.
He was convicted by a lower court on two counts of keeping a common bawdy house and fined $7,500.
The other case involved Jean-Paul Labaye who ran a members-only club called L'Orage.
He was convicted of keeping a bawdy house and fined $2,500.
At the Court of Appeal, however, the cases took different turns. Labaye's conviction was upheld while Kouri's conviction was overturned. Now the Supreme Court has given a favourable ruling in both cases.
Edited by lequebécquifume (12/21/05 07:38 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
Zantoo
|
12/21/05 09:35 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
Ian
|
12/21/05 10:04 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
escapegoat
|
12/21/05 10:07 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/21/05 01:27 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
escapegoat
|
12/21/05 11:59 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Kirk Tousaw
|
12/21/05 01:14 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/21/05 03:14 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/21/05 04:32 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/21/05 05:57 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/21/05 07:01 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/21/05 07:39 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
StrngrInParadise
|
12/22/05 05:29 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/22/05 09:34 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Kirk Tousaw
|
12/22/05 03:30 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 03:50 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Kirk Tousaw
|
12/24/05 11:59 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/24/05 12:52 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/27/05 08:10 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/28/05 04:31 PM
|
The Supreme Court's swingers decision ... (Op-ed)
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/28/05 05:05 PM
|
Ardent but wrong (op-ed)
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/28/05 05:12 PM
|
Re: Ardent but wrong (op-ed)
|
Kirk Tousaw
|
01/01/06 11:01 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/28/05 05:08 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/28/05 05:35 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/28/05 05:43 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/28/05 05:47 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Queen of C.
|
12/28/05 06:00 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/22/05 09:28 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Zantoo
|
12/22/05 09:43 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Kirk Tousaw
|
12/22/05 03:38 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
davidmalmolevine
|
12/22/05 11:43 AM
|
Canada ... land of the harmless pleasure seekers
|
davidmalmolevine
|
12/22/05 12:35 PM
|
Re: Canada ... land of the harmless pleasure seekers
|
Smartypants
|
12/22/05 01:52 PM
|
Top court redefines obscenity
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/22/05 09:25 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
MedPotMarc
|
12/22/05 09:45 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Zantoo
|
12/22/05 09:53 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
MedPotMarc
|
12/22/05 10:04 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 02:22 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Zantoo
|
12/22/05 02:44 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
MedPotMarc
|
12/22/05 05:29 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Zantoo
|
12/22/05 06:55 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
MedPotMarc
|
12/22/05 07:30 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 08:44 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
doublehaze
|
12/22/05 04:11 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 04:46 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
doublehaze
|
12/22/05 06:10 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 06:41 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
hypnos
|
12/22/05 04:46 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
doublehaze
|
12/22/05 06:06 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Goodsters Wife
|
12/22/05 06:32 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
MedPotMarc
|
12/22/05 06:40 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
doublehaze
|
12/22/05 08:25 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
london
|
12/23/05 11:04 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
mjbudder
|
12/22/05 05:06 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Marc Scott Emery
|
12/22/05 06:21 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Marc Scott Emery
|
12/22/05 06:29 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Zantoo
|
12/22/05 06:47 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 07:35 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
maha
|
12/22/05 09:52 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Chris Emery
|
12/22/05 10:13 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
Chris Buors
|
12/22/05 10:36 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
maha
|
12/22/05 10:45 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/22/05 01:20 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
maha
|
12/22/05 01:28 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
maha
|
12/22/05 10:52 AM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
WebFX_
|
12/22/05 03:33 PM
|
Re: Top court redefines obscenity
|
MedPotMarc
|
12/22/05 09:25 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
tbud
|
12/22/05 08:50 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
Queen of C.
|
12/22/05 11:56 PM
|
Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
cypress
|
12/23/05 06:00 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
Queen of C.
|
12/23/05 08:09 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/23/05 08:33 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
eco2man
|
12/23/05 09:15 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/23/05 10:14 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
eco2man
|
12/23/05 10:31 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
talisman
|
12/23/05 11:53 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
maha
|
12/23/05 09:56 AM
|
Re: Editorial: Decency versus harm
|
lequebécquifume
|
12/23/05 10:11 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Kirk Tousaw
|
12/24/05 11:52 AM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not
|
Chris Buors
|
12/24/05 12:01 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
Zantoo
|
12/23/05 02:13 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
Queen of C.
|
12/23/05 02:35 PM
|
Re: Supremes use harm principle for swingers, not pot!
|
Queen of C.
|
12/23/05 04:14 PM
|
|
Moderator: BongPixie, CaliGrower, chrisbennett, Dana Larsen, FranCouver, Fred_the_Plumber, frmrgrl, goodster, jacob, JodieGR, Marc Scott Emery, MICHY, OCNORML, puff_tuff, Rudy, stinkweed, voodoodol
|