I was gonna edit the article about Buors, but after reading it I find it to be pretty decent and an accurate depiction based on what I've read about Buors Politics.

There's a Paragraph that cites his accusors as calling him homophobic, but he is given a qute that I think accurately reflects what he is voicing here.

tell me if I've got the message wrong:

"You wanna be a homosexual, fine. Just don't expect me to hang out with you"

Thats what i'm reading into this...among other things...and I think the article seems accurate enough.

I've just finished editing the Cannabis Culture page in wikipedia to include the Magazine and links to the BCMP and Marc Emery. It's a minor edit and I would like to go back and write alot more on that article, any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

I also viewed the edit history for Chris Buors wiki entry and it would clearly appear that the user CJCurrie takes issue with Buors and has alluded to such in her Edit history reffering to Buors as "Buors isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer (among other things)".

whatever. If Buors truly thinks as little of the Wikipedia as he claims then he'd be wise to leave it be if he doesn't like it.