Tim, you're the only one posting on here and nobody's listening to your schpeel anymore.

No Larry we just haven't had anything to disagree with in the last few post.

Larry...
Look at just how many hits this thread gets every day...
Somebody is reading this...
Type Repuke into Google my friend and see...

Tim is a liberal shill...He gets paid by the post

How to spot a shill

Here's a few highlights from the article:

3.Like a zombie who packed a knife for an intellectual gunfight, the paid shill gets blown away after every post but refuses to die. The anonymity of the internet, coupled with financial incentive, rids the shill of any sense of dignity or integrity. If the shill's arguments are going badly, often they will attempt to derail the conversation to a topic they feel more comfortable with

4. Obligatory mentioning of duty in armed services or a handicapp...This one is fairly common. It serves to put the speaker in a revered position, implying a superior level of patriotism. It also sets the ground work for accusations of not respecting our service members or the handicapped, should a straw man argument become necessary.

5. Complete disregard for facts that disprove his rhetoric. This is the big kahuna of paid shills. Without conversation there is no pay. Thus, as noted in point 3, a shill will do anything possible to keep the conversation going long after it should have ended (example:tim's obsession with "hit$" on his thread)....

end sample





Thats why he never responds to my counter arguements, besides the fact that he's lacking the education to form a truly educated analysis based on political science or history...

Thats why instead of getting a debate from tim we get crickets chirping instead while he continues to post layers of material that nobody reads except for the sparse regulars that visit this sight...

Thats why whenever somebody posts a counter point he immediatly posts 15 articles after yours in order to "bury" your response so it quickly gets forgotten...

The sheer volume of "views" illustrates how much $ can be made regardless if hes the only one reading it...he's very proud of his thread as is displayed by his numerous remarks about how he's the first hit in a google search....$$$$

Thats why nobody bothers to engage tim anymore..its pointless, hes a shill... And everybody knows it..

i read it but stopped commenting because it tends to get repetitive with the back and forth ..and that it doesnt solve anything when your talking to people who wont see it for what it is and not what the tea party are making it ..thanks for posting tim ..keep um coming ..

Damn 19.5 I found that you meet all the your ways to reeconise a shrill.

Like I said....
The Sh-- will ramp up as we get closer to November...
Some here are living proof...


And Now trying to Highjacking this thread with more Bullspin..

‘On his own’ Romney ad star took over $1 million in government loans

The up-by-his-bootstraps businessman who stars in an ad for Republican hopeful Mitt Romney seems to have built his business through government-sponsored loans, putting a dent in the campaign’s attack on President Barack Obama’s saying to business owners, “you didn’t get there on your own.”

“My father’s hands didn’t build this company? My hands didn’t build this company? My son’s hands aren’t building this company?” New Hampshire businessman Jack Gilchrist, president of Gilchrist Metal, asks in the ad that’s been making waves since last week.

Reporting by The New Hampshire Union Leader disputed this claim by looking into Gilchrist’s history, revealing that he took over $1 million in government loans since the 1980s, including $800,000 in tax-exempt bonds issued by the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority to build a new manufacturing plant and buy equipment. Gilchrist also admitted to the paper that he took a U.S. Small Business Administration loan of “somewhere south of” $500,000 in the 1980s, and said that to this day about 10 percent of his business comes from defense-related projects.

http://youtu.be/fLZpMFbxyxU

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/24/on...vernment-loans/

Mitt Romney Accused of Buying Twitter Followers

Mitt Romney's Twitter account is creating controversy not because of any actual tweets, but because of a sudden and dramatic spike in followers. The presidential hopeful gained more than 135,000 new followers over the weekend; prior to that, he'd been racking them up at a rate of 3,000 to 4,000 per day. The Twitter tracking site 140elect.com noticed the extraordinary growth, and folks in the Twitterverse immediately began tweeting their own theories. Here's one: "That awkward moment when people notice Mitt Romney has been buying followers."

Others suggest the followers aren't even human. Certain signs point to the possibility that some new arrivals could be "Twitter bots," as they have trouble spelling certain words and have no followers of their own. The Romney campaign's digital director, Zac Moffatt, rejects that theory, saying, "We have reached out to Twitter to find out additional information regarding the rapid growth. "

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/trending-now/mitt-romney-accused-buying-twitter-followers-183024486.html

Interesting that both you and 19.5 see a need to respond, even though there's no real interest among those here in changing their position.

IMO, the entire US electorate is facing a similar problem, in that politics has become extremely polarized and neither side really want to listen to the other side of any given debate. it has become more importantfor most to vote "against" something, than it is to vote "for" something. It's telling when Romney only descibes his future policy as doing the opposite of Obama. Really????