|
2 registered (duthc, 1 invisible),
128
Guests and
41
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
38613 Members
55 Forums
183210 Topics
1648921 Posts
Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
#1748094 - 07/13/12 07:58 AM
Re: led lights?
[Re: nutogrow]
|
Stoner
  
Registered: 12/20/11
Posts: 431
Loc: Yes
|
Nutogrow,
I agree with your comment regarding heat, as all forms of converting electricity into light are inefficient to some degree (pun intended) and thus give off heat as well as light, although I believe in this case, you are referring to the power supply and it too has it's inefficiency, as does the ballasts on HIDs and CFLs. It comes under the conservation of energy section of thermodynamics and is a fact of life, with the exception being super conductors.
Where I respectfully disagree with you is your comment that this is a "led debate and sales pitch" as the original statement from Ayos was "I am looking to see if a led light would do my plant any good and if so what color would be best".
I asked Ayos for more information and stated twice that "I'm not trying to start a LED vs. HID vs. CFL discussion or hijack this thread" and once stated "As you can see Ayos, everybody wants to help you but you need to talk to us or this thread will become a LED vs. HID vs. CFL debate."
That being said, I'm willing to give Ayos two weeks to respond (he started this thread on Monday, the second of July) and then we will start debating.
Best regards to all,
52.
_________________________
Ignorance is bliss, knowledge is awesome.
***Censored***
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BongPixie, CaliGrower, chrisbennett, Dana Larsen, djpenguin, Earl, Forum_Moderator, Fred_the_Plumber, frmrgrl, goodster, Green Bastard, innercityseed, jacob, jawohio, JodieEmery, mr.clone, muadhib, puff_tuff, Rebel Dawg, stinkweed
|