http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/const/lawreg-loireg/p2t31.html
The government repeals other laws! Cannabis prohibition could have been ended decades ago and that government website has proof! Thousands of Canadians are federally licensed to possess and use medical marijuana through Health Canada who have permission to have a limited amount of cannabis! guess how the scheme in canada came into being? controlled opposition promoting legalization.

The government of Canada is preventing a Free Market while Canadian’s suffer and die. The government is fixing the price of food, energy, fuel, fiber, medicine keeping the cost of living artificially high by maintaining cannabis prohibition. Nobody dies from cannabis and water kills people. If people knew the truth there is no way the Canada could maintain cannabis prohibition, please share this far and wide.

End Cannabis Prohibition and Repeal the unconstitutional law(s) The prohibition against marijuana was unconstitutional from its inception.

Definition of CARTEL:
1: a written agreement between belligerent nations
2: a combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices
3: a combination of political groups for common action

Example of CARTEL: a cartel of oil-producing nations that controls production and influences prices

Cannabis needs to be exempted from all laws practically everywhere, the only way to put the cartels out of business is to allow the cultivation, processing, transportation, distribution, sales, trade, sharing, possession, consumption and use of cannabis (hemp) for industrial, medicinal, nutritional and recreational purposes repealed. Nobody has any right to restrict anyone, any age, a harmless plant safer than drinking water.

Legalized Medicinal marijuana is a scam because it discriminates and limits the public’s access to this harmless medicine that saves lives. Nobody dies or suffers injury from THC. Governments test hemp fields for THC as if it were dangerous scaring farmers away from growing Hemp.

Hemp would solve world hunger and most of the world problems like the energy crisis, deforestation, disease, repair our soils and renew with vital nutrients and so much more it would take too long to list. Pollution from poisonous energy sources like petroleum, coal, natural gas, nuclear, and the tar sands are poisoning the planet and canadians this whole time Hemp could replace all poisonous energy sources while creating oxygen and breathing in CO2. Hemp uses less water no herbicides and no pesticides. The first diesel fuel was made from oil pressed from hemp seeds. It’s non-toxic, a nitrogen fixer, grows well nearly everywhere, a renewable resource, makes food, fuel, paper, rope, medicine, cosmetics, plastic, housing and much more.

If cannabis prohibition ended so many new businesses and jobs would be created instantly. Everything made from toxic oil today, can be made from non-toxic hemp. Any limits or restrictions on hemp are preventing a free market. Would you want a license to grow vegetables? The idea of having a license for cannabis sounds like the Slave Master telling the slaves how many plants they can grow. Nobody has any right to dictate!

Regulate: to govern or direct according to rule
Control: to exercise restraining or directing influence over : (i.e. to regulate)
Tax: to make onerous (troublesome/burdensome) and rigorous demands on

Legalization sounds like the corporate takeover of the cannabis industry via government legislation (over-taxation, over-regulation and over-control)

this applies to america too and any other commonwealth nation.

I like what Harper had to say about the war on drugs "its not working" too bad that he is too fucking moronic to figure out how to stop it. End prohibition dumbass.

Prohibition could end next year. We just need to get Gary Johnson into the White House. He's currently polling at about 10%, even though most haven't heard of him. Even many potheads haven't heard of him. Once they do, most will vote for him. He has detailed positions on all issues & explains the advantages.

Potheads voting for Obama or Romney may go to prison as thanks. Gary Johnson cares about the 100% equally. People outside US can contribute money or buy stuff, or just pass along his name & positions. Maybe take enlarged pics of the Marleyboro mugs & run off a bunch of copies to give/show people & get talking about it.

It occurs to me that some Canadians have relatives in US. If you talk to them in person, on phone or e-mail, please ask if they've heard of Gary Johnson.

I don't know how much of the Harper drug attitude is a result of US saying we'll tie up the border if Canada doesn't arrest sellers, growers, transporters. Might Canada re-legalize if US does it first? GWTJ

If the U S would ease up most of the world would find they had less pressure on them to fight the weed.

The border threats are empty. I hope the initiatives in Colorado and Washington pass. The dominoes will start tumbling. I'm pretty cynical though, voting machines and all that.

While this is a good idea on the surface, there's a problem. As I've said numerous times, the U.S. is a two-party system. That means if you are anything, and I do mean anything, other than a Democrat or a Republican, you aren't going to get in office. The government-media social conglomerate won't allow for it. Just being labelled as a "libertarian" automatically means you will be blackballed if you try to go for the Presidency.

Basically, if you vote for a Libertarian in the Presidential race, you just gave your vote to the side you didn't want to win. That's how it works here. You either vote Democrat, or Republican. There are no other sides when you're talking about the Presidency.

However, if the U.S. ever did legalize pot, there is 0% doubt that other countries would loosen up on their own drug wars. It is specifically because of the U.S. that the drug war is going on so bad still.

If you have no hope to fight then you will always lose and they will always win. I'm not into no hope no fight situations. I do not believe in them, they are unicorns.

The flaw in what you are saying is "yes we are a two party system but those parties do change". The Rep.s came into being to fight the social injustice of slavery. The first two parties were Wigs and Fed.s. So not voting for the party we need will never get things changed. We must show that a 3rd party is growing and might have a chance even if we lose a few in the long run we win. But we have 40 years of knowing we don't win as things are.

Well, the way things go in countries like the U.S., the political parties usually taper inwards rather than flower outwards. I wouldn't be surprised if we eventually have a one-party only system in the U.S. with no choices, as that's where it's headed, historically speaking.

Of course, this is also not long before the collapse of the society as well.

What I do see you're all saying is to keep up the good fight, which is admirable. But the problem is, you're not going to convince a machine who's fuel is money to vote for something that will make it less of said money. I do know things don't change if complacency persists, but you have to understand how the world works nowadays. It's not the 1800s anymore. You can't just rush the White House and take it over anymore. There are no more revolutions in the fucked new world we live in. And people aren't going to be on your side when something is historically listed as "counter culture." When you're on that side, you are continually marginalized as new generations of mindless drones are bred with the same old biases of being against the counter culture.

The ONLY way to truly achieve what you're saying, is to let the old system completely collapse and obliterate itself and pray and hope that the new system is made by the people on your side. In some countries, historically speaking, this has been the case, and they have pretty alright societies as a result. The U.S. is NOT one of them, however. The U.S. is built on the idea of conflating people's minds into following a strict sense of order and rules, to keep the current society in continuity.

I guess it is possible, and it may happen, but it's probably going to take a societal collapse to eradicate the drug laws. Most educated scholars agree that the U.S. isn't going to last for much longer. We have probably another good 80-110 years or so, before it starts to truly disintegrate. However, there will be several smaller "collapses" before the big one wipes us out. In fact, the one closest now is supposed to hit in just the next few years. It will be an economic one, that will eclipse the 2008 U.S. economic downturn by far.

Remember the more things change the more they stay the same. Those new "mindless drones " are no more mindless than those of the 50's and 60's remember "America love it or leave it" of thbe 60's Now this isn't saying nothing can change but that changes will be small. And as far as weed being legal being big it is to us but not really in the way this country is ran.