|
5 registered (my1952HD, duthc, 3 invisible),
114
Guests and
46
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
38605 Members
55 Forums
183207 Topics
1648847 Posts
Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
#1744167 - 06/01/12 08:02 PM
Re: 48hr darkness myth??
[Re: Rebel Dawg]
|
Old hand
 
Registered: 08/17/09
Posts: 1109
|
I am high, so I don't know how much sense I'm going to make, but I'm having trouble understanding how a flushed plant is going to have anything left to metabolize for even one day after the flush, let alone 3-7 day.
Every day, the plants use light energy to photosynthesize. You take away the light, after the nutrients in the plant tissue are used up, growth stops. So this thing, you're taking away both the nutrients and the light, and the plant is supposed to somehow have increased trichome production? In the last 3-7 days?
Would you expect a clone to root if it were taken from a plant that had been flushed? (I don't mean a flowering plant, just a plant that had been deprived of nutrients) I would expect the clone to fail, as the nutes would have already been used up during the flush. Am I looking at this the wrong way? Lol
_________________________
9/11 was an inside job. Rights are only protected by force, so be strong. End the Fed.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1744198 - 06/02/12 06:35 AM
Re: 48hr darkness myth??
[Re: Rebel Dawg]
|
Veteran
 
Registered: 02/24/11
Posts: 1381
|
all these old wives tales crack me up. If love and nurturing coupled with genetics didnt grow the stuff great, putting it in ice water is not going to fix that. Agreed, I too have played with this idea and no longer have any intrest in trying again. The ice water thing I do do though. Not because it makes for better smoke, but because Im a lazy fuck and its easier to flush with a hose from the tap then from my reservoirs 
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1744302 - 06/03/12 01:12 AM
Re: 48hr darkness myth??
[Re: Rebel Dawg]
|
Veteran
 
Registered: 05/17/10
Posts: 1268
Loc: Australia
|
all these old wives tales crack me up. If love and nurturing coupled with genetics didnt grow the stuff great, putting it in ice water is not going to fix that. Given any plants response time to a changing or ailing factor such as climatic conditions, doesn't it seem reasonable that a plants already slow reaction to adverse conditions will not be affected by such a short change in photoperiod? forgive me if i seem a little unorthodox, but plants as we know them already take long enough to respond to a change in climatic conditions that 48 hours seems a little crazy response time for the "output" to be significantly increased. Yeah rebs, im with ya. GUYS, you have a whole 70-120 days of flowering, why put so much interest in the last two days? If your not doing your job properly during the 2-3 months before hand whats do you magically expect to happen just before harvest?
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BongPixie, CaliGrower, chrisbennett, Dana Larsen, djpenguin, Earl, Forum_Moderator, Fred_the_Plumber, frmrgrl, goodster, Green Bastard, innercityseed, jacob, jawohio, JodieEmery, mr.clone, muadhib, puff_tuff, Rebel Dawg, stinkweed
|