|
2 registered (Simo man, 1 invisible),
115
Guests and
40
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
38645 Members
55 Forums
183221 Topics
1649020 Posts
Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
#1740850 - 04/26/12 05:21 AM
Re: Light question?
[Re: Doobie_Brother]
|
Veteran

Registered: 10/04/06
Posts: 1590
Loc: right here
|
I think a 10,000k MH emits more uvb than an HPS. My suggestion is that adding blue and/or uvb will increase thc production as i said. The lamp is not the issue. MH or flourescent, sunlamp, or whatever.
...."I've been growing under metal halides (MH) lamps for more than 20 years. In CC issue #34 you stated that MH lamps are useful only when the amber light of a high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamp would cause a problem. My associates and I would disagree. The consensus among us is that HPS lamps produce more weight, but the stoniest, longest-lasting high comes from metal halide lamps.
Ultra-violet (UV) light is the key. MH lamps produce more than HPS lamps and the more UV, the higher the potency climbs in normally high potency plants. I grow for buzz, not weight, or you could say for love, not money, so the MH lamps suit my purpose. I use a Sunmaster MH lamp. The plants produce a little more weight under them than the old 5500K (Color temperature) bulbs, but they've kept the UV light strong."
Anonymous Bud, Clifton, Colorado
Edited by larrys_one (04/26/12 05:48 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BongPixie, CaliGrower, chrisbennett, Dana Larsen, djpenguin, Earl, Forum_Moderator, Fred_the_Plumber, frmrgrl, goodster, Green Bastard, innercityseed, jacob, jawohio, JodieEmery, mr.clone, muadhib, puff_tuff, Rebel Dawg, stinkweed
|