38653 Members
55 Forums
183228 Topics
1649029 Posts
Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
#1736484 - 03/14/12 01:34 PM
Re: C-10 Crime Bill returns to House of Commons
[Re: Spuzzum]
|
Member
Registered: 04/12/09
Posts: 117
Loc: Lotusland
|
Actually, night need clarification on the amount in possession before being considered trafficking. The GOC's website still says 3kg's, but the CBC NewsWorld was saying yesterday "any" amount will be considered trafficking.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1736518 - 03/14/12 06:30 PM
Re: C-10 Crime Bill returns to House of Commons
[Re: Spuzzum]
|
Journeyman
Registered: 02/09/12
Posts: 80
Loc: Northern, Ontario, Canada
|
(spuzzum) Looks like the postings got off topic untill I could arrive. However glad to know im following it alright and others heard and read the same things. Again no word on if thats the C10 in any way, but as for Health Canada changing the rules now that makes sense. Well sorry it doesnt make sense but maybe what I mean is thats where im getting confused on the revoking of ppl and dgl. Bad news is that others have in fact heard the same things and it looks like a few of my big dreams will be trickling down the drain at some point. That being said im on may to "puff" this off my shoulders.
_________________________
It helps me forget..
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BongPixie, CaliGrower, chrisbennett, Dana Larsen, FranCouver, Fred_the_Plumber, frmrgrl, goodster, jacob, JodieEmery, Marc Scott Emery, MICHY, OCNORML, puff_tuff, Rudy, stinkweed, voodoodol
|