Who's Online
4 registered (werq02, kakikaku, halphdunn, davidmalmolevine), 63 Guests and 44 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Advertisement
Shout Box

Newest Members
werq02, kakikaku, little miss, dealova10, florinadian
38653 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Doobie_Brother 107
weedmen 87
Chris628 79
kenny_canuck 74
rasta 74
Forum Stats
38653 Members
55 Forums
183228 Topics
1649029 Posts

Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Advertisement
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#1666446 - 10/11/10 10:31 AM WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..???
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
Hi everyone,

I was looking around and didn't see it mentioned in here in recent history...

It has come to my attention that NGW has been issuing a possibly TOXIC product..

So far, it seems to be limited to the 1/2" black and blue vinyl tubing with "NGW" labeled down the side... But ALSO possibly rearing it's ugly head in SunHuts as well...

Here is a link and a quote..

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=188434

Quote:
Warning new off gassing product!!!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So I have been experiencing a mysterious yellowing for about 10 months. Every thing that went into one of my 11 different rooms (some that had been going 5+ years) started to yellow and eventually die. My first instinct was my ph I checked my pens, they were not very far off but I calibrated and bought new probes anyways. That did nothing. Then we suspected the nutes, maybe we got a bad batch. I had bought 6 gallon jugs and filled all my 1 gal’s up off the same batch. Call the company run the batch numbers and they say they are 18 months old, So we went out bought new nutes and nothing changed. So after that I figured my favorite brand had fallen off and we decided to try another brand. We go buy $1000 worth of canna. And we thought possibly it could be something with our clones so we picked up a batch of clones from an LA club. Same thing new nutes new genetics same yellowing. So now I am scratching my head start making some calls visit a bunch of other rooms, and at least 20 in my immediate area have this same mystery problem. So I do some research find out we are all on the same water supply. I found 4 rooms on another water district doing bitching so I say BINGO, It must be the water. We go out and buy a 275 gallon tote and start buying water from this other district. A real pain in the ass I might add we had to do 2-3 trips a week to meet our demands. Same problem. We start doing testing 1st water test, 2nd tissues sample, I have a horticulturist come and look at things. He suggests an Iron def. We get our tests back everything looks good. We do a tissue sample off a room that is doing good compare our results and everything is fine. Except my plants still look like shit. So I emailed my test results to my original nute company they pass it around the office and let everyone take a look at it. I get a call a couple of days later from them and he asks me if I have ever considered off gassing. What is crazy is the night before I found a thread on the hydro huts and was showing my partner how Identical it looked. So now we go to our rooms and start looking around at what it could possibly be. Like I said some rooms had been going in the same location with nothing changed in about 5 years. There is only 1 new product that we had replaced the ½ tube that connects all the buckets. I started to call around and every room that was having the problem had replaced there tube with the new stuff. The 4 rooms that were doing good were using old hose and was just washing it out. So being lazy saved theses guys who would of thought. I have been talking to the company that made the offending tube for 4 months and they do not wish to resolve this problem even though I have proof that the toxic chemical is in the tube. We have done GC/MS testing, LC/MS, testing and FT IR testing that show conclusively that the chemical Diisobutyl phthalate is in the tube. This is the same chemical that caused the problems with the hydro huts. If you are having a mysterious yellowing and are using NGW tube replace it immediately and please respond to this thread. I am going to be working on a class action against these guys. I have some of the worlds top experts on the matter willing to testify and do any research needed to win this case. The idiots printed there names on the tube it has n-g-w.com printed every foot, so it is easy to identify.


Here is a brief description of what the phthalate does to the plants.

The toxicity caused by a volatile constituent from certain samples of flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
was due to dibutyl or diisobutyl phthalate (DBP or DIBP) plasticisers. It has caused serious financial
losses in the horticultural industry. The two phthalate esters have low volatilities, so any toxicity lasts
for many years. Radish (Raphanus sativus L. cv. Cherry Belle) seedlings, exposed to an air stream
containing 160-180 ng dm~3 of butyl phthalates developed chlorotic leaves within 3-4 d and died
within 12 d. Neither dioctyl nor diisodecyl phthalate (DOP nor DIDP) produced damage in the test
plants. Measurements of photosynthetic and respiratory gas exchange in intact shoots of affected
radishes showed that photosynthesis was severely inhibited whilst respiration was virtually
unaffected. Electron micrographs of sections from young leaves showed disruption of thylakoid
formation and granal stacking. In mature leaves, thylakoids and grana were well formed but
chloroplasts were swollen and the thylakoids were pushed towards the vacuolar side of the
chloroplast. Sensitivity to toxic phthalates varies between species; all members of the Crucifcrae tested
were susceptible, tomato less so, and lettuce and ryegrass were resistant. Toxicity of DIBP, from PVC
glazing strip, caused a reduction in crop value of £20000 per acre per year in commercially grown,
monocrop tomatoes.




The effects of phthalate esters on chlorophyll a2 fluorescence in radish plants (Raphanus sativus L. cv.
Cherry Belle) were examined Fluorescence yield was increased in those plants exposed to an aerial
concentration of 120 ng dm"3 dibutyl phthalate (DBP) at a rate of 3-0 dm3 min"1 for 13 d.
Comparison of fluorescence enhancement ratios and Fr^/F01 suggests that DBP inhibits photosynthesis
in radish plants at a site after QA. Both DBP and diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) strongly
inhibited uncoupled (PS2 + PS1) electron transport rates in thylakoids isolated from spinach. At a
chlorophyll concentration of 10 /ig cm"3 the concentrations of DBP and DIBP exhibiting 50%
inhibition were 44 mmol m " 3 and 42 mmol m " 3 respectively. Basal electron transport rates were also
inhibited, with 87 mmol m"3 of DBP or DIBP producing 50% inhibition. Measurement of
photosystem 1 activity suggested that the main site of action of these phthalates was localized at a site
near the reducing side of photosystem 2.


ECA #10281

The analysis of the samples has been completed and the results are given below. The sample information is:
______________________________ ____________________ ________________
Customer Identification: PVT Tube
Sample #: 10281a
Date Received: 7-12-10
Test Requested: Identification and Quantification of Phthalate(s)
USP <851> FTIR with quantitative extraction.

Sample Results
PVT Tube
15.95% diisobutylphthalate
FTIR spectrum matches well with diisobutylphthalate library spectra and reference standard.



Here is another link to the SunHut issue...

http://www.breedbay.co.uk/forums/hydro-h...cies-death.html

(Pics shown in link)
Quote:
Default Hydro Huts Causing Plant Deficiencies and Death
There is an issue with Hydro Huts, Sun Huts and all grow tents manufactured in China that some of you may be aware of. However, there haven't been any threads here at the Bay dealing with the problems that Hydro Huts are causing on plant growth or the lack thereof. So, I thought I would start this thread to make everyone aware of what is going on and Texas Kid will be along shortly to share with you the recent remedy being implemented by Hydro Hut, specifically, for all Hydro Hut users experencing these problems.

First of all, in the last few months, Hydro Hut users from around the globe have been reporting problems both in online forums as well as directly to the manufacturer. The problem they are reporting is that within days of plants being put into SOME Hydro Huts, the plants start exhibiting extremely slowed growth followed by severe yellow of the leaves with only the veins remaining green. The pictures posted up by these growers show what would normally look exactly like a SEVERE Cal/Mag and/or Iron deficiency. This severe yellowing in many cases was followed by necrosis of the leaf and, ultimately, death of the plants.


The following are pics of plants from FIVE SEPERATE Hydro Hut users and this is from just one thread found at ICMag.

Picture provided by SkillsBot2935


Picture provided by BudZad7


Picture provided by KissOfDeath


Picture provided by streetgreen



You can clearly see the similarity in all of the plants and this is a SERIOUS problem for those who have these affected Huts/Tents.

************************************************** ******
Important Notice - Not ALL Hydro Huts, Sun Huts and other Chinese manufactured Grow Tents are affected. The problem is affected in SOME units manufactured in Summer 2007 and forward.
************************************************** ******

After much speculation, conjecture and experimentation by many growers and Hydro Hut themselves, the problem has been traced to a base polymer in the plastic used to manufacture the white PVC lining inside the tent. Apparently, there is some toxin emitted from this base polymer that is causing a SYSTEMIC lockout of Magnesium and/or Iron. Note that I stated "Systemic", meaning uptake from the roots is inhibited in some way. This condition can be SOMEWHAT managed by foliar feeding with Cal/Mag and it will retard the process but NOT cure it.

Hydro Hut, Sun Hut and the other Chinese manufactured grow tents all purchase their tent canvas from the same supplier in Japan as this Japanese company has the only machine in the whole Orient that bonds the canvas to the PVC. The reason we know this is because all the various brands of grow tents mentioned are assembled in the same plant in China using the same canvas purchased from the Japanese supplier.



The following pics from Tricknology show just how fast the onset of the problem occurs.

Healthy Plant - Day 1 Just Prior to going into Hydro Hut


Three Days Later in Hydro Hut the yellowing ensues


Day 5 in Hydro Hut the yellowing is already severe


After 7 Days in the Hut





I wanted to make any Hydro Hut users here at the Bay aware of this potential problem and let you know not to worry as Evan, the owner of Hydro Hut, has been and is standing behind his products. As I stated at the top of this post, TK will be along shortly to post up the manifesto directly from Hydro Hut that will tell you how you can get your Hydro Hut fixed through their "proprietary process" at no charge to the user.

To this point, I am not aware of any efforts being made by Sunlight Supply/National Garden Wholesale (the maunfacturers of the Sun Hut) or any of the various manufacturers of other Chinese made tents to remedy this problem in their products. Only Hydro Hut, so far, has made extensive efforts to correct the deficiency. Anyone experincing problems with grow tents other than Hydro Hut should contact the manufacturer to make them aware of this problem as they not not even be aware themselves yet.

It is important to note here that neither the Homebox XL (which is manufactured in Germany) or the Dark Room Grow Tent (manufactured in France) exhibit these problems. So anyone owning the Homebox or the Dark Room would be exempt from this alert.

Stay tuned to this thread for more information on the topic from TK!


RB



Here is MY personal experience with this.. I am in the middle of my 5th failure in 5 months.. All modes of failure following this VERY SAME PATH...

I've tried my Aero/NFT, Bubble buckets, and soil-less...

My pics...(using pics from the SunHut site for comparison)

Quote:
There healthy plant going in..


Mine (ok so it wasn't that healthy, I thing the problem was already starting to yeild it's head from being in my VEG unit, with the tubing)


theirs after 5 days..



Mine...


Theirs after 7days..




Mine..





Compelling..



As you all can see, this could be a HUGE HUGE issue...

For now, if you are using NGW tubing ANYWHERE in your garden, you should isolate it and do some testing with another manufactured 1/2" tubing..

Cheers

Top
#1666452 - 10/11/10 11:16 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
Organic Gardener Offline

Organinerd
***

Registered: 06/19/08
Posts: 4598
Loc: Cannafornia
if you're still in the tent it could be the off gassing even though i've heard that the issue was supposed to be resolved. If you can go with a secret jardin dark room. they have no off gassing problems and i've experienced nothing but good results in mine.
_________________________
KISS Cloning Guide

Organic Grow Guide by OG

Organics - Growing on cruise control.

Organic Mafia - Cali Division


Top
#1666453 - 10/11/10 11:23 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: Organic Gardener ]
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
I'm not in a tent, I was using the tubing...

I wanted everyone here to understand...

I AM NOT saying that this IS a problem, I am providing the information for YOU to decide if it is a problem..

I'm having issues, weather or not it's the tubing, I'm still trying to figure out... I have to push the exposed plants through the system, as I don't have any parent stock that hasn't been exposed..

Top
#1666456 - 10/11/10 11:29 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
McLovin' Offline
Pot Head
***

Registered: 12/13/08
Posts: 3317
Loc: dirty south
maybe try flushing everything out Deb and running no nutes for a day or two and see what happens, what you got to lose and best of luck
_________________________

Top
#1666457 - 10/11/10 11:32 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: McLovin']
Organic Gardener Offline

Organinerd
***

Registered: 06/19/08
Posts: 4598
Loc: Cannafornia
forgive me I saw sunhut and assumed you were in one of the toxic tents.
_________________________
KISS Cloning Guide

Organic Grow Guide by OG

Organics - Growing on cruise control.

Organic Mafia - Cali Division


Top
#1666464 - 10/11/10 12:13 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: McLovin']
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
Originally Posted By: McLovin'
maybe try flushing everything out Deb and running no nutes for a day or two and see what happens, what you got to lose and best of luck


already tried brotha.. Thank you.. Seems regardless of high or low nutes, does the same..

Across the now 5 failures, I've tried no nutes, low nutes, mid nutes, and high nutes... Never once have I gone over 1200ppm...

The Aero/NFT system I'm modeling, came from a HT magazine, and the article mentions running veg at 1500ppm (of botanicare) and flower at 2000ppm.. I tried that with Botanicare with the same results..

Top
#1666474 - 10/11/10 12:29 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: Organic Gardener ]
Harvey_M Offline
Old hand
***

Registered: 08/17/09
Posts: 1109
You definitely deserve a thank you from this entire site for putting this info up. I clicked your link in your other thread, and NGW doesn't seem to be racking up any karma points, that's for sure. I like how their shameless self serving advertising, putting ngw.com all over the tubing, comes back to bite them in the ass, perfect. Any company that calculates what they can get away with vs the cost of making it right deserves to go broke, I hope they do.
I wonder how many hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, were lost due to this toxic product.

I also wonder how much other shit in our gardens is toxic. I looked into it a little, and it seems like if you look hard enough, you'll find people saying almost anything is toxic, so who knows. People say pvc, cpvc, vinyl tubing, various plastics, and neoprene are all toxic. All I know about for sure is garden hose, it contains lead unless it is a drinking water safe hose. I wonder about my RO storage containers, they're 45 gallon plastic garbage cans, they smell, (offgas) and the smell never goes away. Same with my wal mart aquarium tubing, that has a strong synthetic smell, but it hasn't seemed to cause any problems.
_________________________
9/11 was an inside job.
Rights are only protected by force, so be strong.
End the Fed.

Top
#1666476 - 10/11/10 12:38 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: Harvey_M]
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
Well, thank you Harvey, I appreciate that.. I'm hoping others will too..

my problems could be my own, for sure, not saying I'm using NGW as a crutch to explain WHY I'm failing, but it's a compelling story..

Thanks again..

Top
#1666520 - 10/11/10 04:40 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
Harvey_M Offline
Old hand
***

Registered: 08/17/09
Posts: 1109
Well, if you got rid of all that NGW shit, then it is your nutes, probably. I don't understand all these high tds recommendations, but then again, this is a competitive game, and unfortunately, disinformation seems to be a part of it.

Maybe try 6-9/5/25 cal mag/liquid karma/pure blend pro, with a total tds under 400, don't bother chnaging the nutes the whole grow, and alternate grow and bloom formula at every addition? And keep your res at like 60F in aero?


Edited by Harvey_M (10/11/10 04:42 PM)
_________________________
9/11 was an inside job.
Rights are only protected by force, so be strong.
End the Fed.

Top
#1666719 - 10/12/10 06:29 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: Harvey_M]
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
I JUST got rid of the tubing, the origional post was made 9/11/10 and I didn't get the heads up until 9/23
So while i believe i see positive results, its basically starting over from scratch, seeings how my main RO rez had the tubing in it, so everything from clone to flower got at lest small amounts..

My cloner didn't have any of the tubing in it, but my Aero/NFT veg unit did.. I never really seemed to have too much of an issue in veg, but then again, I never really had what others did in veg either.. just less overall growth, smaller leaves...ect..

I'm not sure if this problem would be with both water passing through it and air flowing around it.. but I was also using the tubing for my water cooled light fixture.. so the tubing ran through the room, carrying warm water 12hrs at a time, possibly heating and speeding the offgassing into the atmosphere..???

AFA the high PPM recomendations... The system and high fert recommendations came from Best of HT #54

I've never come close to the articles r

Top
#1666720 - 10/12/10 06:39 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
it cut off my post from my phone, Ill follow up tomorrow, been a long day, my mom broke her anckle this morning and ive been with her all day...

cheers

Top
#1666965 - 10/14/10 08:10 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
U_G_U Offline
Stranger
*

Registered: 10/14/10
Posts: 5
Deb sorry you got hit with the NGW tube problem. I am the one that did the research. Your plants will recover depending on how bad they are it can take a month. The only problem is some strains tend to through bananas even after recovery.

Top
#1666995 - 10/15/10 09:03 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: U_G_U]
DebDeb Offline
Journeyman

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 67
Really... I'm glad to see you here... Have you spread this around? because I didn't see anything here recently...

AFA recovery, I believe I am see recovery already, it's difficult to say yet though... I just got the info and have been making changes since..

Thank you though..

Top
#1667002 - 10/15/10 09:30 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
U_G_U Offline
Stranger
*

Registered: 10/14/10
Posts: 5
No I never posted here. My login was not working. But after seeing your post I made a new account. I emailed the editer of the mag but they never got back to me. Here are my recovery methods if you have not seen them yet they will help a lot.

RECOVERY METHODS

Just so everyone knows how to make recovery as fast as possible. 1st remove every last bit of tube 2nd reduce light it is phytotoxic so light reacts and causes the burn. Either move the plants out from direct light or put a piece of window screen over the lens of the hood to cut the light output. 3rd is foliar feed I did a 300ppm of my base nutes a couple times a week. 4th cut added co2 and just use fresh air your plants cannot benifit from added co2 when they are in this condition. 5th if you have a carbon filter turn it on the carbon traps any molecules floating around. 6th wouldn't be a bad idea to do a res change it is a low molecular wieght phthalate so it is soluble in water according to some research I found last night.

Top
#1670057 - 11/02/10 01:16 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: U_G_U]
U_G_U Offline
Stranger
*

Registered: 10/14/10
Posts: 5
Just a heads up.

NGW has began distributing new tube with no packaging and no writing on the tube what so ever. I have not had a chance to have it tested yet, I just received a new roll yesterday. But be on the look out. I would only use general hydro or hydro farm since those are both marked and has been proved safe.

Top
#1675331 - 12/07/10 11:01 AM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: U_G_U]
U_G_U Offline
Stranger
*

Registered: 10/14/10
Posts: 5
Did Sunlight Supply Poison Hydroponics Medical Marijuana?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A few years ago, professional state-legal California medical marijuana growers noticed their hydroponics crops were showing yellowing leaves, stunted growth, and poor yields. In some cases, entire crop cycles were wiped out.

The growers lost huge amounts of sleep, money and valuable medical marijuana, nearly going crazy trying to understand what was killing their crops. They examined all the factors you’re supposed to examine when you have crop problems: pH, water quality, nutrients, climate control, pests, diseases, plant genetics. You name it, they looked at it.

Through a process of elimination they narrowed the cause down to a toxin called Diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) allegedly contained in National Garden Wholesale (NGW) ½” Black Flexible Polyvinyl Chloride Tubing. NGW is an affiliate of hydroponics distributor Sunlight Supply, and all three entities are also known or affiliated as IP Holdings LLC.

The hydroponics growers say they had tests run, and conducted tests themselves. Convinced by the testing that NGW tubing was the culprit, they contacted Sunlight Supply and NGW, seeking an explanation and compensation. They got nowhere, so they retained an attorney, Jeffrey Lake. After Lake contacted Sunlight/NGW, he received an August, 2010 letter from an attorney representing the companies. The attorney is named Joshua Stump.

Mr. Stump’s letter offers various attacks dismissing the growers’ claim that NGW tubing damaged their crops. It also contains a troubling section in which Stump says that regardless of whether the growers’ crops were legal according to California law, they were still illegal under federal law. As such, the lawyer claimed, the “illegality” of the medical marijuana enterprise would likely protect Sunlight/NGW from product liability claims.

Stump further hones in on the medical marijuana aspects of the situation by asking all kinds of prying questions about the identity and confidential financial and/or medical history of medical marijuana patients and growers.

Medical marijuana attorneys who examine Stump’s letter say Stump’s approach leaves the impression that Sunlight/NGW is making a veiled threat to harass and/or nark out medical marijuana growers and patients as part of the Sunlight Supply defense strategy should the hydroponics growers file a product liability claim.

On November 22, 2010, Lake and his client plaintiffs (referred to as BT Collective) filed a class action complaint against IP/NGW/Sunlight in San Diego County Superior Court.

During my research about DIBP and other toxins that might enter plants via hydroponics materials, I learned that such chemicals may harm humans as well as hydroponics plants. I also discovered a substantial record of complaints and concerns regarding toxicity problems associated with indoor hydroponics grow tents and chambers made from plastics and other materials.

Beginning in 2006-07, an increasing flood of hydroponics growers began complaining in online hydroponics cultivation forums and elsewhere about off-gassing and poisoning caused by toxins in hydroponics grow tent materials and similar materials. Hydroponics growers told me they’d had problems with indoor chambers made or distributed by HydroHut, Sunlight Supply and other companies.

Reports from growers indicate that of the tent/chamber manufacturers whose customers were complaining about toxic materials, only HydroHut exercised good customer service in seeking to resolve the issues.

In preparation for writing this article, I directly contacted Sunlight Supply to ask them about their tubing and the court filing, and I had previously posted a hydroponics article containing public questions for Sunlight Supply. The only response I ever got from Sunlight Supply was one email from Stump.

But instead of providing the information that hydroponics growers need to know about Sunlight Supply products and the Sunlight Supply customer service and warranty policies, Stump tried to get me to disclose information about myself.

I was leaked what is purportedly a communication sent to hydroponics dealers from Sunlight Supply’s president, Craig Hargreaves, regarding BT Collective’s claims about NGW tubing. I am including the letter in its entirety, because I want to make sure that Sunlight Supply’s version of events is represented fairly. Here is the letter Hargreaves allegedly sent to his retailers:



Craig R. Hargreaves

“I write to you today to discuss a matter pertaining to our Eco-Plus ½ inch black (part # 708235) and blue (part # 708225) branded tubing. Sunlight Supply/NGW has purchased this tubing from a Chinese manufacturer for approximately 3 years now and have sold it without any complaints from our customers. However, we recently received a single complaint from a group called "The BT Collective", a group out of Southern California stating that use of this tubing has caused damage to their crop. When we were first notified of this complaint we requested additional information to help us verify the claim. While the BT Collective responded to this request with additional claims, they failed to provide adequate information to determine whether any of the tubing had caused harm to their crops.

The claim cites that a certain chemical used in the makeup of the tubing, is specifically responsible. To date, we have no credible evidence that this chemical, which is used to give plastic products a soft, pliable feel, has caused any harm to any customer's crops.

Sunlight Supply/National Garden Wholesale has purchased and sold this tubing for 3 years. In this timeframe, we have not received a single complaint from any storeowner or consumer before hearing from the BT Collective. In our experience, when there is a product on the market which is causing plant damage, that problem is quickly discovered. Our customers understandably care a lot about their plants and tend to report problems immediately after they are discovered. In short, we believe that if there were truly a problem with the tubing we have sold, we would have heard about it from customers long before now and from multiple sources. We have not.

Further, when we first started purchasing this tubing, we conducted internal tests by growing plants fertilized and irrigated with water running through the tubing and simultaneously submerged a full 100-foot roll in the reservoir. Our internal tests revealed no damage to the plants.

Sunlight Supply/NGW is a distributor of thousands of different products manufactured by hundreds of different manufactures. Black ½ inch vinyl tubing (the vast majority of sales) is a commodity product both for the industry and us. Sunlight Supply/NGW has no good reason to believe that the tubing it has been purchasing from its Chinese manufacturer causes harm to plants. However, rather than engage in a complex scientific debate, it is far easier for us to merely change tubing vendors.

Out of an abundance of caution, here are the steps we have taken:

Discontinued purchasing from the previous Chinese vendor for the Eco-Plus branded ½ black (product #708235) and blue (product # 708225) vinyl tubing.

Discontinued selling to Dealer Partners these 2 products.

Clarification - The Chinese manufacturer made only 2 of the tubing products (1/2" black and 1/2" blue). No complaints have been received related to any other tubing products in the dealer catalog (page 262).

Changed over to a domestic (USA) supplier on ½ inch black and blue vinyl tubing. These products will now be sold under the Gro-Pro brand name. For inventory clarification, the part numbers have changed. GroPro brand ½ inch black tubing is part #708265, ½ inch blue tubing is part #708260.

All orders now shipping, on ½ inch black and blue vinyl are now made in the USA and have been certified by the manufacturer as, "food grade" and made with only FDA approved materials.

In a good faith show of support for you, our valued business partners, we are offering to take back for credit or exchange (for the USA GroPro brand product) this tubing from any dealer partner wishing to return the Eco-Plus brand ½ inch black or blue tubing. Please contact your local customer service representative with any such requests.

Sunlight Supply/National Garden Wholesale takes our obligation to provide our Dealer Partners with quality, safe and functional products extremely seriously as we have for the last 15 years. At this time, we have no verifiable evidence beyond the BT Collectives claim, that plants irrigated and fertilized through EcoPlus brand ½ inch black and blue has caused damage to plants. However, we felt obligated to inform our Valued Dealer Partners of this matter.

As always, thank you for your ongoing support of our company.

Craig R. Hargreaves, President

Obviously, if you are using an indoor hydroponics pre-made chamber, or thinking of buying one, be sure to ask the manufacturer about toxic off-gassing and warranties. In general, you need to be cautious when using any plastic or other petroleum-based material in your grow room, and do what you can to determine if it might off-gas anything that harms you or your plants.

Please note that Big Mike Straumietis of Advanced Nutrients has repeatedly charged that Sunlight Supply and its allies are amoral profiteers who refuse to respect or acknowledge the medical marijuana community or legal hydroponics medical marijuana growers, but they do like to make tons of money selling them hydroponics products.

You’ll note for example that in the Sunlight Supply letter you just read, Craig Hargreaves offers only to reimburse “dealer partners” (retailers) for unused NGW ½ inch tubing. He makes no offer to reimburse growers who say they’ve lost tens of thousands of dollars worth of medical marijuana crops because of that tubing.

“The issue of whether NGW tubing poisoned crops will be explored scientifically, I hope. What worries medical marijuana growers is a big hydroponics company that responds to a warranty issue by hiring a lawyer who hides behind medical marijuana being illegal federally,” said a hydroponics grower not affiliated with BT Collective. “We already knew that Sunlight, Hydrofarm, Maximum Yield, Urban Garden and the rest of those types are hypocrites who won’t allow any mention of medical marijuana growers at their trade shows and in their magazines, even though medical marijuana growers are a majority of hydroponics customers. But when Sunlight Supply uses federal marijuana law to shield itself against claims from hydroponics growers whose crops got ruined, that’s worse than hypocrisy.”

Top
#1675845 - 12/10/10 12:44 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: U_G_U]
Stonercool Offline
Stranger

Registered: 09/11/09
Posts: 8
Originally Posted By: U_G_U
Did Sunlight Supply Poison Hydroponics Medical Marijuana?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A few years ago, professional state-legal California medical marijuana growers noticed their hydroponics crops were showing yellowing leaves, stunted growth, and poor yields. In some cases, entire crop cycles were wiped out.

The growers lost huge amounts of sleep, money and valuable medical marijuana, nearly going crazy trying to understand what was killing their crops. They examined all the factors you’re supposed to examine when you have crop problems: pH, water quality, nutrients, climate control, pests, diseases, plant genetics. You name it, they looked at it.

Through a process of elimination they narrowed the cause down to a toxin called Diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) allegedly contained in National Garden Wholesale (NGW) ½” Black Flexible Polyvinyl Chloride Tubing. NGW is an affiliate of hydroponics distributor Sunlight Supply, and all three entities are also known or affiliated as IP Holdings LLC.

The hydroponics growers say they had tests run, and conducted tests themselves. Convinced by the testing that NGW tubing was the culprit, they contacted Sunlight Supply and NGW, seeking an explanation and compensation. They got nowhere, so they retained an attorney, Jeffrey Lake. After Lake contacted Sunlight/NGW, he received an August, 2010 letter from an attorney representing the companies. The attorney is named Joshua Stump.

Mr. Stump’s letter offers various attacks dismissing the growers’ claim that NGW tubing damaged their crops. It also contains a troubling section in which Stump says that regardless of whether the growers’ crops were legal according to California law, they were still illegal under federal law. As such, the lawyer claimed, the “illegality” of the medical marijuana enterprise would likely protect Sunlight/NGW from product liability claims.

Stump further hones in on the medical marijuana aspects of the situation by asking all kinds of prying questions about the identity and confidential financial and/or medical history of medical marijuana patients and growers.

Medical marijuana attorneys who examine Stump’s letter say Stump’s approach leaves the impression that Sunlight/NGW is making a veiled threat to harass and/or nark out medical marijuana growers and patients as part of the Sunlight Supply defense strategy should the hydroponics growers file a product liability claim.

On November 22, 2010, Lake and his client plaintiffs (referred to as BT Collective) filed a class action complaint against IP/NGW/Sunlight in San Diego County Superior Court.

During my research about DIBP and other toxins that might enter plants via hydroponics materials, I learned that such chemicals may harm humans as well as hydroponics plants. I also discovered a substantial record of complaints and concerns regarding toxicity problems associated with indoor hydroponics grow tents and chambers made from plastics and other materials.

Beginning in 2006-07, an increasing flood of hydroponics growers began complaining in online hydroponics cultivation forums and elsewhere about off-gassing and poisoning caused by toxins in hydroponics grow tent materials and similar materials. Hydroponics growers told me they’d had problems with indoor chambers made or distributed by HydroHut, Sunlight Supply and other companies.

Reports from growers indicate that of the tent/chamber manufacturers whose customers were complaining about toxic materials, only HydroHut exercised good customer service in seeking to resolve the issues.

In preparation for writing this article, I directly contacted Sunlight Supply to ask them about their tubing and the court filing, and I had previously posted a hydroponics article containing public questions for Sunlight Supply. The only response I ever got from Sunlight Supply was one email from Stump.

But instead of providing the information that hydroponics growers need to know about Sunlight Supply products and the Sunlight Supply customer service and warranty policies, Stump tried to get me to disclose information about myself.

I was leaked what is purportedly a communication sent to hydroponics dealers from Sunlight Supply’s president, Craig Hargreaves, regarding BT Collective’s claims about NGW tubing. I am including the letter in its entirety, because I want to make sure that Sunlight Supply’s version of events is represented fairly. Here is the letter Hargreaves allegedly sent to his retailers:



Craig R. Hargreaves

“I write to you today to discuss a matter pertaining to our Eco-Plus ½ inch black (part # 708235) and blue (part # 708225) branded tubing. Sunlight Supply/NGW has purchased this tubing from a Chinese manufacturer for approximately 3 years now and have sold it without any complaints from our customers. However, we recently received a single complaint from a group called "The BT Collective", a group out of Southern California stating that use of this tubing has caused damage to their crop. When we were first notified of this complaint we requested additional information to help us verify the claim. While the BT Collective responded to this request with additional claims, they failed to provide adequate information to determine whether any of the tubing had caused harm to their crops.

The claim cites that a certain chemical used in the makeup of the tubing, is specifically responsible. To date, we have no credible evidence that this chemical, which is used to give plastic products a soft, pliable feel, has caused any harm to any customer's crops.

Sunlight Supply/National Garden Wholesale has purchased and sold this tubing for 3 years. In this timeframe, we have not received a single complaint from any storeowner or consumer before hearing from the BT Collective. In our experience, when there is a product on the market which is causing plant damage, that problem is quickly discovered. Our customers understandably care a lot about their plants and tend to report problems immediately after they are discovered. In short, we believe that if there were truly a problem with the tubing we have sold, we would have heard about it from customers long before now and from multiple sources. We have not.

Further, when we first started purchasing this tubing, we conducted internal tests by growing plants fertilized and irrigated with water running through the tubing and simultaneously submerged a full 100-foot roll in the reservoir. Our internal tests revealed no damage to the plants.

Sunlight Supply/NGW is a distributor of thousands of different products manufactured by hundreds of different manufactures. Black ½ inch vinyl tubing (the vast majority of sales) is a commodity product both for the industry and us. Sunlight Supply/NGW has no good reason to believe that the tubing it has been purchasing from its Chinese manufacturer causes harm to plants. However, rather than engage in a complex scientific debate, it is far easier for us to merely change tubing vendors.

Out of an abundance of caution, here are the steps we have taken:

Discontinued purchasing from the previous Chinese vendor for the Eco-Plus branded ½ black (product #708235) and blue (product # 708225) vinyl tubing.

Discontinued selling to Dealer Partners these 2 products.

Clarification - The Chinese manufacturer made only 2 of the tubing products (1/2" black and 1/2" blue). No complaints have been received related to any other tubing products in the dealer catalog (page 262).

Changed over to a domestic (USA) supplier on ½ inch black and blue vinyl tubing. These products will now be sold under the Gro-Pro brand name. For inventory clarification, the part numbers have changed. GroPro brand ½ inch black tubing is part #708265, ½ inch blue tubing is part #708260.

All orders now shipping, on ½ inch black and blue vinyl are now made in the USA and have been certified by the manufacturer as, "food grade" and made with only FDA approved materials.

In a good faith show of support for you, our valued business partners, we are offering to take back for credit or exchange (for the USA GroPro brand product) this tubing from any dealer partner wishing to return the Eco-Plus brand ½ inch black or blue tubing. Please contact your local customer service representative with any such requests.

Sunlight Supply/National Garden Wholesale takes our obligation to provide our Dealer Partners with quality, safe and functional products extremely seriously as we have for the last 15 years. At this time, we have no verifiable evidence beyond the BT Collectives claim, that plants irrigated and fertilized through EcoPlus brand ½ inch black and blue has caused damage to plants. However, we felt obligated to inform our Valued Dealer Partners of this matter.

As always, thank you for your ongoing support of our company.

Craig R. Hargreaves, President

Obviously, if you are using an indoor hydroponics pre-made chamber, or thinking of buying one, be sure to ask the manufacturer about toxic off-gassing and warranties. In general, you need to be cautious when using any plastic or other petroleum-based material in your grow room, and do what you can to determine if it might off-gas anything that harms you or your plants.

Please note that Big Mike Straumietis of Advanced Nutrients has repeatedly charged that Sunlight Supply and its allies are amoral profiteers who refuse to respect or acknowledge the medical marijuana community or legal hydroponics medical marijuana growers, but they do like to make tons of money selling them hydroponics products.

You’ll note for example that in the Sunlight Supply letter you just read, Craig Hargreaves offers only to reimburse “dealer partners” (retailers) for unused NGW ½ inch tubing. He makes no offer to reimburse growers who say they’ve lost tens of thousands of dollars worth of medical marijuana crops because of that tubing.

“The issue of whether NGW tubing poisoned crops will be explored scientifically, I hope. What worries medical marijuana growers is a big hydroponics company that responds to a warranty issue by hiring a lawyer who hides behind medical marijuana being illegal federally,” said a hydroponics grower not affiliated with BT Collective. “We already knew that Sunlight, Hydrofarm, Maximum Yield, Urban Garden and the rest of those types are hypocrites who won’t allow any mention of medical marijuana growers at their trade shows and in their magazines, even though medical marijuana growers are a majority of hydroponics customers. But when Sunlight Supply uses federal marijuana law to shield itself against claims from hydroponics growers whose crops got ruined, that’s worse than hypocrisy.”


Okay, so I just started this info yesterday and now I see someone has posted the whole article.

This is just outrageous and Sunlight Supply shouldn't get away with this sort of poor quality behavior.

If people can, please pass this link around to other boards to make sure that no one else gets hurt from poor quality products.

http://www.rosebudmag.com/growers/hydrop...-marijuana.html

We need to make sure that growers are always safe and that they can trust the equipment they buy.



Top
#1678530 - 12/29/10 12:42 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: Stonercool]
ponics4me Offline
Stranger
**

Registered: 07/31/09
Posts: 13
I've noticed the word seems to be spreading, and that's good.

Make sure everyone you know hears about this. Sunblight Supply wins if they can keep this out of the public eye enough that people don't realize just how fascist their business practices are.

Threatening to call the DEA? F'ing narcs. Screw them!

Top
#1678546 - 12/29/10 02:57 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: DebDeb]
CAnnabisCA Offline
Enthusiast
*

Registered: 01/09/10
Posts: 219
What is NGW tubing?

I use black PVC tubing to feel my res... should I get PE tubing instead?

Top
#1715715 - 09/23/11 11:46 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: CAnnabisCA]
BigTomato Offline
Stranger

Registered: 09/23/11
Posts: 1
Medical pot business wants to keep court battle secret


At first glance, the lawsuit filed this year in federal court in downtown San Diego by BT Collective appears to be nothing more than a dispute over allegations that one business sold faulty products to another.

But a closer look shows the suit, a potential class-action case, is more than that — one where a pursuit for secrecy by both sides earned the ire of a federal judge and which illustrates the conflict between state and federal law over medical marijuana.

BT Collective is a medical marijuana operation in San Diego that opaquely describes itself in the lawsuit as a manufacturer of “natural and organic health care plant products.” It filed suit against Sunlight Supply, a Washington company that sells indoor gardening supplies, blaming the business for selling black flexible irrigation tubing that contains a toxin that ravaged and wiped out the collectives plants.

Last week, both sides requested to file under seal Sunlight Supply’s motion to dismiss the case, as well as all of its exhibits and any further legal briefs from either side.

The reason: The documents would touch on “sensitive matters pertaining to criminal liability due to differences between state and federal law.”

In other words, they would be talking about cultivating marijuana — legal under California’s medical marijuana law but illegal under federal law.

U.S. District Judge Larry A. Burns would have none of it. “BT Collective is more than welcome to bring this case against Sunlight Supply, but it cannot expect the Court to insulate it from the collateral consequences of doing so,” he wrote Tuesday.

In a sharply worded three-page order, Burns said the collective was trying to fly “under the radar of federal law enforcement.”

Earlier in the case, both sides agreed that the deposition of BT Collective CEO Travis Yost would be taken under seal, citing the same federal-state law concerns.

That request was granted by a different judge, but Burns wiped out that order, too, saying the deposition is not in the case file and the witnesses avoided any criminal issue by “vigorously asserting their Fifth Amendment rights in response to questioning.”

The collective now has two choices, Burns concluded. “One, it can litigate the case with total transparency and roll the dice that the United States does not file criminal charges against it,” he said. Or, it can drop the suit.

Yost did not respond to a request for comment. A lawyer for Sunlight Supply declined Thursday to comment on the case. The company has denied its products are responsible for the marijuana collective’s problems.

BT Collective filed papers Wednesday asking Burns to stay his order while they appeal the issue to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Jeffrey Lake, a prominent medical marijuana lawyer in San Diego who represents the collective, said the secrecy is necessary because both sides “should have the right to litigate a civil matter without fear of criminal prosecution.”

The case was initially filed in state court, Lake wrote in an email, but was moved to U.S. District Court by Sunlight Supply because federal courts have jurisdiction over cases between people or businesses in different states.

Lake said that move was part of Sunlight Supply’s legal strategy and raised a larger question — whether one side in a dispute “can take advantage of a conflict of laws by changing jurisdictions in order to subject an opposing party to potential criminal liability.”

Alex Kreit, a law professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, said the case illuminates the vexing position that medical marijuana providers are in.

“The difference between state and federal law puts those medical marijuana collectives in a tough position,” Kreit said.

Other businesses can go to court to settle a dispute, but medical marijuana collectives have to think twice because it may expose them to scrutiny by federal law enforcement, he said.

“Just the possibility of federal prosecution carries a lot of downsides,” Kreit said. “It makes it more difficult for the collectives to pursue remedies if they are defrauded or sold a defective product.” The conflict between state law that allows medical marijuana cultivation and federal law that does not and considers all marijuana to be an illegal drug is normally played out in criminal courts, Kreit said. Collectives and cooperatives operate knowing that federal prosecutors could take action against them.

Even so, the broad request for secrecy in this case was not warranted, said Peter Scheer, a lawyer and executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, an open government advocacy group in San Rafael. “My first thought is the judge is right,” Scheer said. “When you file a lawsuit, it is inherently a public matter, and there is good reason for that.”

Scheer posed a similar scenario of a lawsuit over the copyright to computer software that allows someone to avoid paying taxes.

“I don’t think you could go into court and expect the court to seal all the documents to protect you from the prying eyes of government authorities,” he said.

He also said because BT Collective’s suit is about an allegedly defective product the case could have broader interest for other businesses and the public. Keeping that information open is a crucial consideration, Scheer said.

Top
#1744656 - 06/06/12 12:08 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: Stonercool]
knowboddy Offline
Stranger
*

Registered: 01/28/10
Posts: 9
Originally Posted By: Stonercool
Okay, so I just started this info yesterday and now I see someone has posted the whole article.

This is just outrageous and Sunlight Supply shouldn't get away with this sort of poor quality behavior.

If people can, please pass this link around to other boards to make sure that no one else gets hurt from poor quality products.

http://www.rosebudmag.com/growers/hydrop...-marijuana.html

We need to make sure that growers are always safe and that they can trust the equipment they buy.



Not sure if you guys saw this. It's a disturbing situation, especially when you read the comments at the end of the article and see what happened to these marijuana growers.

Top
#1744657 - 06/06/12 12:14 PM Re: WARNING: Possible Toxic tubing from NGW..??? [Re: knowboddy]
Rebel Dawg Offline

Super Stoner
***

Registered: 09/06/07
Posts: 4616
Loc: Medical grow in USA
old news but somewhat important huh.
_________________________
Respect Few Fear None
Trust No One
Smoke all the bud you can because tommorrow you might die.


Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >