226. Fake e-mail (5/4)

My wife's adopted father passed away on 4/30. Feds killed two of her closest relatives in 35 days, all aimed to arrange a trip to connect her to a framed case. The later April frame case seemed soured again but not finished. They may have another one followed in later May or early June. SARS is activated, low interest rate waiting to be lifted up, houses held by Feds must be sold off before then. It's a hurry.

Of course, each time there was a framed case, it always came with internet problem. In later April I was blocked to many web sites for several days. I was blocked to access about 4 sites which belong to about.com, more sites which belong to Delphy group. Include one which I used to post my new message at first. Many other sites were blocked to access by "Web Site Not Responding ", "Error: page not found".

My computer was under Feds control. Any access to internet must be filtered by their server. Each time I started up, there is always a waiting period which I think was the time for the agents to be in their surveillance postion. Each time I went to a new URL which was not in "my favorite" list, there would be a delay too. At that time, there used to be a frozen page to enforce me to re-enter the internet that would take some time. Which I think was the time they used to check that new web site to see if I was allowed to enter. Many times I posted the message and made sure to see my thread was lifted to the top of list, then found the new message disappeared if I came back a few minutes later. Which I believe they had another server to fed me an incomplete information. I have experience that a web site I regularly to post had been suddenly "dead". What I saw was there was no more activity in that forum. But a year or so later, when I saw a reference link and clicked on it, I was led to that forum and found it was never "dead". I can only conclude the URL in "my favorite list" was put by a special link which led me to a "dead page" they prepared for me.

I also was bothered by constant pop-up of the page to suggest me to download "debug program" or "firewall" to prevent virus. I think it was from Feds. If I download these "program", I may download some "criminal record" they want to plant or even an evil program which would sending spamming e-mail from my internet address.

On 4/29, there was such an e-mail for me:

"Subj: AOL WARNING: Your account is a near to be closed
Date: 4/29/2004 6:57:56 PM Central Daylight Time
From: bill_support@aol.us (AOL Support Dptm.)

Dear KatHakSung,

It has come to our attention that your AOL Billing information's records are out of date.
This requires an update of your billing information. Please take several minutes out of your
online experience and update your billing records. You will not run into future problems with our online services.
However, failure to update your records will result in your account termination. Please update your records right now.
Once you have updated your account records your AOL session will not be interrupted.
Please click the link below to update your billing records:

http://aol-cs2.com

Sincerely,

America Online, Inc."

I asked AOL service. They said it was not from them. It was a forgery. So you can expect update will have an evil result.

I announce here once again that I don't do any business in internet. I will never send any e-mail for commercial purpose. I don't communicate with private e-mail unless for some problem enquiry to web site host. I will never threaten other people.

227. A violent way? (5/9)

On 5/5, newspaper reported gas price was near record high. "12 cents overnight spike in bay area angers many, and could jump 7 to 10 cents today." It was $2.21 per gallon on 5/7. I view this round of gas price hike as an effort of Feds to push for the sale of house. After nearly three years of low interest rate, the potential capable house buyers had their houses already. So Feds hope the commuters who live in nearby area to go back to San Jose house market. When the gas price had a sudden jump, I thought Feds was irritated by pressure of rising interest rate. (Of course, they always have some other excuse to cover up the real purpose of rising gas price.)

Really, on 5/8, media reported April was the second strong month for job growth. " US banks are reporting stronger demand for business loans.". "Interest-rate fears send Dow, Nasdaq tumbling.". The "economic recovery" designed for Bush's second term can't wait any longer. So Feds must act before the interest rate rises in this summer.

This reflects the intensified persecution. Killing to arrange trips, visiting at night to pick up tickets, mission at the door which haven't seen for year. I worry there will be a violence planned on me.

On Feb. 23, 2004, there was a string of shootings in highway 580 in East bay area. No one was seriously hurt. I noticed it because media talked a lot about it. Sniper killing is a tactic Feds used to use.

On 3/11, in a well-orchestrated news conference in which police declared Chris Gafford was arrested as the highway sniper.

There was a dramatic turn around next day(3/12). District attorney refused to prosecute Gafford, said there wasn't enough evidence even though authorities from the CHP, the BATF, the Sheriff's Office and local police all said the evidence was strong.

I think Feds plotted a case between 3/1 to 3/12 to frame me in drug case. The tool they used was a car. (see "212. Link to car (3/9)") To guide me into the "car would cause problem", they made my wife send our car to repair. A trap with a borrowing car was too evident so I went to shopping by bike on 3/6. On 3/12 my wife got back our repaired car. Which meant the "car trap" plan was over. The news of D.A.'s refusal to prosecute highway sniper was on same day. I think it is another plan to continue the persecution. This time, they tried a sniper killing. If that happens, they would attribute it to "highway sniper". That's why D.A. refuse to prosecute Gafford. They have another "candidate".

From then on, my wife was reluctant to drive me to shopping. Several times, she refused straightly and said, "go by bike". I had to ask help from my brother.

On 4/24, while my wife was in Hongkong and I couldn't touch my brother, I went for a short time shopping by bike. It was the only bike ride I took since 3/6. The newspaper next day immediately posted an article, "I-580 sniper suspect's case remains in legal limbo". My sudden bike ride was out of Feds' expectation. To have a frame case, it needs resource. Support groups, witness..... They used to arrange everything then guide victim by a bait. That day, Feds might still concentrated in frame case in HongKong. Anyway, they revived it next day. They used to have a relevant news let out before the incident they intend to create. Which will make a frame case more reasonable.

228. The scandal of D.O.D. and the crime of D.O.J. (5/14)

On 5/6, my wife asked me to check why the alarm light of "service engine" was always on in the car. The car had just been sent for repair for a week in March. I viewed it as a signal that Feds played trick on car again.

On 5/7 evening, my wife called my relative discussing plan to go to San Francisco on week-ends to visit my parents. She spoke loudly so I could hear everything she talked. Which meant my parents wouldn't come for an appointment on 5/8. Originally, my parents had planned to pick me up for a dinner outside that day, and of course, to give me a ride for a food shopping.

The two events hinted me that there was danger to ride on my wife's car. And the help from my relatives wouldn't come. I used to shopping food once a week. I depended on the appointment of 5/8 because this time I hadn't do any shopping for two weeks. If there was no help I would have to go by bike. What would be there waiting for me? Gang violence? Police violence? So I didn't go out but wrote the message "227. A violent way".

The case of US abusing Iraqi prisoners was first appeared in media last week. It reached to peak on Friday and Saturday. On 5/7(Friday), five pictures of abuse case occupied the first page of Mercury News. On 5/8, four pages filled with articles of this issue with titles of "Far worth to come", "Rumsfeld warns more images of abuse will appear". I was shocked. Not for the news of abuse: I knew this government is hypocrite, full of plots, cheating, abuse, crimes. But for the result of news. It will hurt Bush administration and its war policy. That's against the will of inside group. Media is thier tool. How could it do such a movement against its master? I puzzled.

The scandal cool off in following days. A "beheading" case was thrown out to offset the negative result of abusing prisoners. The "far worse photo" won't appear for some reasons. One excuse was for the "privacy" of prisoners. (a most shameless and hypocrite justification) While I was arranging newspaper record, I found this peak time. I suddenly bewared of this was a case set up for diversion. The peak time coincided with possible day I would bike out for food. I had warned Feds use "terrorist attack" to divert. (In December attempt, they raised alarm code to orange, in April case they talked of "Al Qaida attack to HongKong") I didn't expect they manipulate it in this way.

If I was eliminated on 5/8, I think a series of cases would have happened to other people who knew this case. And the scandal would be prolonged by more "far worse photo" and "struggle to pull down Rumsfeld" to diverge public's attention from a framed case. Because a scandal of "D.O.D." is far less important than to cover up the crime of D.O.J..

I had another article about "abusing prisoners" in another thread.
Re:
Government deception (5/13)

Bush said what happened in Abu Ghurayb prison was done only by a few people and high ranking military officials denied they knew anything about it. It was a lie. They knew it clearly there were vast abuse in the jail.

Quote, "Red Cross report details abuse, mistaken detentions in Iraq.
By Bob Drogin
Los Angeles Times.

Washington - Coalition military intelligence officials estimated that 70 to 90 percent of prisoners detained in Iraq since the war began last year "had been arrested by mistake," according to a confidential Red Cross report given to the Bush administration earlier this year.

The report described a wide range of prisoner mistreatment - including many new details of abusive techniques - that it said US officials had failed to halt, despite repeated complaints from the International Committee of the Red Cross. "(S.J.M.N. 5/11/04)

As a matter of fact, torture is a method intelligence used to squeeze information from detainees. US government covered it up with fake news, disinformation and lies. The death of Saddam Hussain's sons was a typical example.

News reported Saddam's sons Uday and Qusay, along with other two people, were all died in a six hours' long battle against 200 US soldiers. But forensic analysis revealed that Uday and Qusay were tortured before their death. There is an article with pictures and details on it.

Quote, "America's Uday and Qusay Conjuring Trick
Latest White House lies reveal larger hidden untruths

Unfortunately the forgery team completely forgot to use any putty around the ankles..... If you look at the color picture of the two cadavers lying side by side, the one on the right has unique brown marks on both ankles. These marks have been identified by experts as pressure sores, caused by iron clamps used to hold the ankles while this poor man was suspended upside down for torture in the "Adnan Chalabi Hilton". As I wrote earlier, death must have finally come as merciful relief for these two......."

http://www.joevialls.co.uk/transpositions/hussein.html

As I told before, media is controlled by inside group. It serves for the war policy of this group. Why this time it suddenly threw out a scandal which hurt the fame of Bush's administration? None of such kind of event happens by coincidence. They always have a purpose. (to be continued)

229. Unreasonable search and arrest (5/19)

In recent messages I revealed how Feds activated their high ranking resources to work in the frame case. How Bush, Cheney, Mueller took part in secret deal with China. The latest message of 5/14 talked about how they planned to use Iraqi prisoners abusing case as a diversion. Then there is a dramatic turn around.

On 5/15, Mercury News reported, "Ashcroft unveils big effort to share anti-terror data.". "The Justice Department will lead a national effort to coordinate intelligence information among all law enforcement agencies, A. G. John Ashcroft announced Friday, in an effort to knock down a "wall" between agencies that many top officials have said hindered the efforts to stop terrorist attacks in this country.

"Government erected a wall that segregated criminal investigators from intelligence agents, government buttressed that wall, and before Sept. 11, 2001, government was blinded by that wall." (by Maria Newman. New York Times)

The so said "wall" Ashcroft referred is a law which forbid to use foreign intelligence information in local criminal investigation. The search warrant for a foreign spy or terrorist is issued by FISA court. (Foreign Intelligence Spy Act) Which is in a low standard, agent can get it only on suspicion. While for a criminal investigation, the search warrant must base on evidence. Because US citizens are protected by 4th Amendment from unreasonable search and arrest. The point of "sharing intelligence information in criminal investigation" is to low the standard of criminal investigation . Citizens can be thus searched and arrested depend on suspicion of agents not evidence. If Ashcroft's propose goes through, 4th amendment then means nothing. FBI is historically notorious for its abusing power.

The wall doesn't hurt any effort to stop terrorist. Feds can apply anytime with FISA court. The real goal Ashcroft wants is to expand police power, to keep American people under his surveillance at his will.

The article also revealed the Feds now is turning onto the help of local police. Which accords with their attempt to force me out by bike. I have alleged I feared a police violence if I biked out.

The news paper next day proves my doubt. There were two articles about police in "World Journal" of 5/16.

One is the story of a food delivery man. He was friendly with police but was sent to court once he broke a rule. His conclusion at last was: Obey policemen, follow law.

Another one is "The experience of a juror". Which talked about the whole procedure of being a juror and a case in court. A man was searched by police officers when he walked on road. They found the defendant had less than a gram of heroin in his pocket. The man was charged two accounts: Holding drug and assault police man. The charge of holding drug dropped in plea bargain. The defendant admitted resist arrest.

What I noticed is the lawyer argued the defendant was searched illegally. He walked on the road, that was true. But there was no side walk for passengers there, so in the law, he didn't break any rule. As policemen, they should know it. It's obvious that police officers arrest the defendant on suspicion not evidence. Breaking the rule of walking on road was only an excuse. It was an unreasonable search and arrest. This shows how 4th amendment is important for the civil right of people. The defendant had been in jail for more than a year already before judge gave the sentence.

My immediate thought was that it proved my allegation they would use local policeman for a violent murder or arrest. When they failed to force me go out by bike alone, they probably would use old tactic, a "juror summon" to force me out. (see "69. Juror summon ")

Not a coincidence, next day on 5/17, a "juror" summon was in my post box. It was for my wife. I think it was a psychological preparation for me to believe all is naturally happened. I expect soon there will be a "juror summon" for me. A procedure prepared for a police search and arrest. When I picked up the summon letter, my feeling was that I almost could predict what they would do in advance. What surprised me was they did it so tightly. They are really in a hurry.

230. Unreasonable search and arrest (2) (5/24)

Several times I found the rice stored at home was poisoned, I concluded at last that it was done when I was out to shopping food when there was no people at home. (That is another advantage to empty the community that there will be no witness if Feds intrudes the house.) That's why I have to shopping at week-ends while my wife could give me a drive and my daughter was at home. My relatives all knew I shopping in this way.

Feds knew this too. So they arranged a trap on Saturday 5/8.(see "228. The scandal of D.O.D. and the crime of D.O.J.") I felt this and on 5/9 posted "227. A violent way?". In which I alleged Feds would use police violence when I biked out. Next day on 5/10, my wife told me the alarm light of "service engine" was off. Later that week, she drove me for a food shopping. It was three weeks I stayed at home without going out. Followed with was "summon" trap as I told in last massage. Then:

On Saturday, 5/22, Mercury News published new photos which said was obtained by Washington Post a day ago. Media is a tool of inside group. Many event was started by newspaper leaking on purpose. Such like Water Gate scandal. When they revived the prisoners' abusing scandal by new photo which has been silenced for some time, I thought Feds was continuing the same tactic they used two weeks ago. You can expect that my wife refused to drive me for food that day.

At noon, I saw a stranger's car coming to park at my garage door. The passengers were my parents, the driver was a friend of my sister. They came from San Francisco. The reason they came here was the car failed in smog check. The mechanic thought it was caused by dirty gas tank so he told the owner to burn out all gas. It needed three hours' drive. So he offered a free drive for my parents to San Jose. And of course, he would drive me for a food shopping when my parents were stay at home. I refused. I straightly told them I worried Feds might have planted something in the car. It would be all their words if they said police found I was doing drug deal in a stranger's car. Same tactic they used two months ago. (see "212. Link to car")

The trap is coming one after another. Obviously the action team is under big pressure from high ranking. Election day is coming. Employment must increase. The interest is hard to stay at recent low level. Real estates must be sold. So they must finish my case.
When the team tried everything, they picked up old tactic they used two years ago. Forcing me out alone, or in a stranger's car, to encounter a police search, then a police violence or arrest. If the arrest happens, force you plea guilty. They don't care how long the sentence will be. Because once you were in jail, there are various way to kill. To persuade you to admit guilty, they do every psychology work on you. One thing is by newspaper. So one day before Saturday, on 5/21, an article posted in Mercury News. Which is similar to one which took place two years ago. (see "66. Turn innocent into criminal (5/20/2002)").

Quote, "50-year sentence is like a last beating
Woman gambles in court, and loses.

"Shanahan, backed up by friends, police reports and photographs of her own blackened eyes, testified that her husband beat her repeatedly for years." She killed her husband when he threatened to kill her. "The prosecutors offered a plea bargain that would have freed her in as little as four years. Shanahan turned it down, gambling that she could avoid a conviction. She could not. She was sentenced to 50 years in prison.". "It's a mandatory law sentencing. Many observers are horrified."
"Consider the Connecticut college student who was peripherally involved in her boy-friend's drug ring - never sold drugs, never used them, had never been in trouble before.
Twenty-five years."

If Feds planned to arrest you in a road search, and fed you such an article to read one day before that plan. What is their purpose? Read message 66 again.

[quote]Dear KatHakSung,

It has come to our attention that your AOL Billing information's [end quote]

Thats called phishing , NOT THE FEDS ,,low level criminals (hacker wannabe`s)

put a firewall on your PC ,then firefox with adblock will stop alot of popups .. Pay for a trusted security package like kasperski if your truly that paranoid?

i have to wonder how you found the on button. let alone come to conclusion`s that you do.

231. Lone wolf (5/29)

On 5/22, Mercury News had such an article, "More anti-terror powers sought". "The Justice Department is seeking to expand its anti-terrorism powers again, adding among other things an FBI subpoena power so secret that even a lawsuit challenging it had to be kept under wraps." It's about Secret surveillance. Which "allow the government to conduct secret surveillance of potential terrorists or spies without proving that they have any affiliation with a foreign government or terrorist organization." "The Senate already has approved legislation making it easier for FBI agents to go after so-called lone-wolf terrorists not affiliated with any known organization or foreign government.".

When Bush created "enemy combatant" to exclude US citizens from their legal right, he at least had some evidence that the "enemy combatant" was either arrested in battle field or connected to a terrorist group. Now D.O.J. created "lone wolf" which covers everyone in US. Almost everybody fits for that definition. Seldom a person has any affiliation with a foreign government or terrorist organization. Yet they can be under surveillance without any evidence only if D.O.J. think he is a potential one.

In May, 2002, I found an attempt frame case applied on me and my relatives by Feds. (see 65. Birthday Party on May 3 (5/10)). After my revelation, within 3 weeks, T(tenant) and B house owner moved out. In August 2002, there was an article in Mercury News, " The court was so concerned by A.G. Ashcroft's behind-the-scenes efforts to broaden the FBI's spying abilities that the court in May secretly ordered Ashcroft to scale back the regulations."

I thus found I was under the surveillance of FISA rule. After the judge found they were cheated by Ashcroft, they rebuked him and ordered him to scale back the regulation in May. The two undercovers, T and B house owner, apparently were Chinese secret police, losing legal base to monitor, had to leave immediately. Ashcroft then in July proposed another plan -TIPS which planned to recruit one million informants, to directly send spies to everyone's house. The plan was opposed by public and failed. see: "85. Chinese secret police and DNA (9/1)" and "86. FISA Secret Court ruling".

Anyhow, I am the witness of their crime, Feds would try their best to eliminate. Inside group arranged an appeal court which in Nov. 2002 ruled D.O.J. had such surveillance power because the Patriot Act gave them so. Once again, I was legally under surveillance. see "100. Power to spy on citizens expanded (11/24)".

Feds framed another drug case in later April, 2003. I analyzed the case and pointed out Feds and Chinese secret police had cultivated that drug gang to frame case on me right from the beginning. I think the internal investigation caused the resignation of DEA director and high ranking official of D.O.J. and F.B.I. in August, 2003. (see "142. Drug case in Fujian", "143. Drug case in Fujian (continuation)(7/10)", "150. Development of Fujian drug case (8/11)")

My case continues for more then 10 years in which Feds invested a lot in real estates. As interest can't stay so low anymore, they are in a hurry to finish it. There were another two big attempts to frame a case on me in Dec. 2003 and Apr. 2004., as well as other continuing small plots of elimination. I think my revelation of secret deal between high ranking officials (Bush, Cheney, Mueller) and Chinese government once again caused the loss of legal base of surveillance power of D.O.J. That's why they start another effort to expand their police power by a larger bill dubbed the "The Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003."

The Act is so absurd that every citizen could have been under surveillance by D.O.J. only if Feds think necessary. The whole situation looks like when Ashcroft was rebuked by the judges of FISA court in May 2002. The only difference is he at that time seeking a plan of TIPS, but this time an Act in the name of anti-terrorism which is much bigger.

232. Terror attack and distraction (6/4/04)

On May 26, A.G. Ashcroft and FBI director Mueller warned public that based on credible source Al Qaida would attack US this summer. FBI also issued 7 pictures of most wanted terrorist suspects.

But in next few days the "credible source" was revealed as high suspect. Some of the "most wanted" were said arrested already.
Re: "Terrorists on Ashcroft's 'Wanted List' Already in Jail
May 27 2004
At least two of the terrorists identified by John Ashcroft as part of an 'Al-Qaeda cell' that is waiting to attack America this summer are already in jail.

http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/may2004/052704wantedlist.htm

Re: "Terror threat source called into question Ashcroft cites al-Qaida plan, but how credible
is the information?

By Lisa Myers
Senior investigative correspondent
NBC News
Updated: 6:57 p.m. ET May 28, 2004

WASHINGTON - Earlier this week Attorney General John Ashcroft warned of an attack planned on America for sometime in the coming months. That may happen, but NBC News has learned one of Ashcroft's sources is highly suspect.

A senior U.S. intelligence official previously told NBC News that this group has no known operational capability and may be no more than one man with a fax machine.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5087301/

Under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can publicly issue such threat warnings. What made D.O.J. neglect DHS? Is FBI really so incompetent to reward suspects whom are in jail already?

The fact that D.O.J. didn't inform Homeland Security Dept. proved that there is no threat from Al Qaida. Feds didn't have any material evidence to send to DHS. They just picked up randomly some information from their old data file to create an "Al Qaida attack".

Then why Ashcroft and Mueller gave such a warning? It's a psychological pre-propaganda for a possible real attack - an attack done by Feds in the name of terrorist in order to distract. Such like McVeigh's excution to divert attention on a framed drug case (soured) in 2001; Michael Jackson's case to divert public's attention on Bush's inglorious London visit; Nick Berg's beheading to divert criticism on abusing prisoners' case.

Recently, D.O.J. had twice plotted frame case on me with terror attack as distracting tactic. (One in Dec.2003 and one in April. 2004) In May, in two attempts of violent elimination, Feds also used the releasing of Abu Ghurayb abusing photos as distracting tactic.(on 5/8 and 5/22)
After the failure of these attempts, on 5/26, they revived old tactic- a terror attack.

Three days after Ashcroft announced terror attack warning, on 5/29, my wife said she would bring her father's ash urn back to Fujian in June. Next day, my sister came to say she would have a party on 6/19. It was 5/3/2002 she had a party last time. Which came with an attempt frame case. (see "65. Birthday Party on May 3") I think a new frame case is planned. If it succeeds, a terror attack will follow to distract. And the time will be around 6/19.

233. CIA chief resigns (6/9)

CIA chief Tenet resigned abruptly on 6/3. He cited personnal reasons for resignation. That's an excuse.

Media said he resigns because of failure in intelligence assessment on 9/11 attack and WMD of Iraq. That he may have been hastened by a critical report from Senate intelligence committee which will single out the errors of the agency. That is not a true reason either, I think.

Failure to warn 911 attack was a very serious fault. As director of CIA, he should have resigned right away after the WTC collapsed. He hadn't. Because 911 attack was allowed to happen. Inside group needed it to activate war in Mid-East. So nobody took the responsibility. Now it's almost three years passed. Is it a late wake up?

Paul O'neill, Richard A. Clarke, all revealed Bush determined to go to war in Iraq even before 9/11. WMD was only an excuse Bush used to start the war. CIA, was forced to squeeze the information to favour the demand of Bush cabinet. CIA, had sent Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate if Saddam intended to buy nuclear material there. He found no evidence could prove this allegation. Government knew this. But Bush still used it as evidence in his State of Union. When Wilson revealed that Bush lied, he was punished. His wife's ID as being a CIA covert agent was leaked by White House.
In whole event, Bush is the main suspect and offender. How could Tenet take over the responsibility?

Then why Tenet resigned? View from this angle. On 5/26, Ashcroft and Meuller announced Al Qaida would attack in this summer. Tom Ridge of DHS didn't know this in advance. Tenet of CIA hasn't mention it too. The information was unique from D.O.J.. But is it the main responsibility for CIA to deal with Al Qaida abroad? How could they let something like 911 take place again in US? That's the real reason of Tenet's resignation. He knew there will be a big attack in coming months. He is not able to stop it. Because again it is from "friendly fire". To avoid to take the responsibility of a big failure, or in another word, to avoid a duty. He resigned in advance to avoid humiliation. (Or another possibility is he was saved from humiliation by inside group, they arranged his resignation to protect him?) The seat of CIA director will leave vacant until November election. Because the attack(s) will take place during that period. So nobody will take the blame of failure again in terrorist attack intelligence.

On the other hand, is it absurd to leave such an important position remained in vacancy when the country is in terror emergency?(as D.O.J. says) Can you immagine a captain of a battleship permitted the leave of the sonar operater while there is an alert of submarine attack? It only proves a designated attack will happen. Samething like "Operation Northwoods".

The terror attack is designed to benefit the interest of inside group. Such like Bali bombing to arouse indignation of the people against Islamic extremist to support Iraq war. Or Madrid bombing to help Aznar's election in Spain. Is it a little bit early to carry out the plan at this time for Bush's re-election?

I've said the attack will take place around 6/19. Feds arranged my wife's trip and a party at that time to fix a frame case. Because they are in a hurry. If you have noticed that most financial experts pridicted that on 6/30, Federal reserve will boost the interest rates. A step they should have done earlier but had postponed by Feds (D.O.J.) for nearly a year. Because they hold a large amount of real estates invested in my case. Feds is in a hurry to finish my case to release their estates. From this event, we can see the interest of D.O.J. is more important than Bush's interest. Other department, DHS and CIA, must give way to it.

234. Multi-nations plot? (6/14)

My wife went to China on 6/13. Where she will meet her brother from Philippines. They will bury thier father's urn. I view it as another effort of Feds to frame a drug case on my relatives and me which is the continuation of the plot of April. (see "222. Perform a secret deal (4/19)")

This time they arranged the meeting of my wife's brother from Philippines. I fear they will create the frame case to "terrorist" in addition to "drugs". I've talked about the "Philippine FBI" is controlled by US FBI. They also manipulate Islamic terrorists to reach their own goal. (see messages 193,194,195,196, 199) In recent newspaper, I read such a news said that Philippines Islamic rebel recruit money by drug smuggling. (World Journal) It's easy to frame a case like that: Ordering some merchandise, planting drugs in the shipment, then the Bureau of Investigation found the receiver is terrorist. My wife's brother is a businessman.It will be easy for him to fall in a trap like that. Feds, of course, will blow the trumpets for a big victory on a case of "terrorist involving drug case".

From my experience, "War on drugs" is a legal title used by Feds to loot money. Their tactic is to cultivate drug gangs, when it grew bigger and fatter, Feds harvest. That's why they created a strict law, to net as many people as possible. More people offended the law, more money Feds could make. That's why "war on drug" can't stop drug but make it bigger, because Feds feed on it.

That's not enough. So when their puppet, G. Bush becomes president, they develop it into "War on terrorism". In the name of "national security", "patriot", they loot more money and power which they can't get in peace time.

My wife originally planned to leave for China on 6/8. I posted on 6/4 a message "232. Terror attack and distraction", alleged Feds planned a plot around 6/19. On 6/7, my wife suddenly cancelled the trip, said she probably would change it to 6/17 or October. The reason she used was lack of flight seat. But lack of seat vacancy didn't have to delay the flight three months later. October? that will perfectly match the president election time. A terror attack then will have the result of one stone to hit two birds: help Bush's re-election and distract on a framed case. I then on 6/9 wrote message 233, linked the resignation of Tenet on coming terror attack, pointed out the relationship of attack and election. I learned on 6/12 that my wife would leave next day. All her decisions were made in one day.

Will Feds plan a "terrorist drug case" in coming week with the cooperation of multi-nations secret police? Will there be terror attack follows? I hope my revelation enable people realize how Feds manipulate drug gangs and terrorist group to meet Feds' own goal. Secret police is the real terrorist in the world.

235. Manipulation and sacrifice (6/19)

I talked about how Feds planted evidence by guiding my wife to buy a lot of vinegar(a material also can be used to produce drugs) then created situation to push us consuming the vinegar as much as possible. (see "112. How they plant (2)") Since I seldom use that kind of vinegar in cooking,(it's more like acid than cooking vinegar with scent) those bottles were kept in bottom cabinet.

About a month ago, my wife asked me, "where are the vinegar I bought?". I looked at cabinet, the bottles were gone. Then my wife said she had cleaned the container of water boiler with those vinegar. She didn't explain how could a small container need so much vinegar to wash. She didn't explain why she asked me whereabout was the vinegar while she knew she had used it up. I late found her purpose was to remind me the vinegar was used up to justify to buy more.

When I complained she bought so much of vinegar which we seldom used, she emptied a bottle to make several cups of source and salted some vegetables. Only nobody has ever touched them.

Two years ago, my wife was guided to buy a lot of such kind of vinegar without awarness it was a plant. When I told her the vinegar was also a material which could produce drug, she should have known the evil purpose of Feds. What made her suddenly used all the old stock up and bought more? She knew we don't touch the food made with that vinegar. I can only conclude Feds need a pile of empty vinegar bottles to show prosecutors as evidence of suspicion of producing drugs. They are in a hurry so they just gave direct order to my wife. So she had such an unusual action.

Samething abnormal is her refusal to drive me to shopping food. It caused inconvenience for herself and our daughter too, because I cook not only for myself but also for the family. Besides, it is against Chinese tradition. Morally, family member should help each other. I could feel she was forced to do so. I have to ask help from my other relatives.

At first, my wife refused to drive me out with various reason. Then, she just say, "Go by bike". It's not her character. I viewed it not her will but the Feds'. Combined with other clues, I realize that after trying every covert method, they'll use a more direct one by forcing me out alone, to eliminate by police violence(or arrest) or gang violence.

My wife originally planned to bring her father's urn back to China in later April. I posted "222. Perform a secret deal (4/19)" alleged Feds again plotted framed case with Chinese secret police. Two days later, my wife had a sudden trip to HongKong visiting her dying uncle. I had suggested her to take the chance to bring the urn back to China. HongKong is not far away from Fujiang. She could save an extra trip. She refused without any reason. I think she couldn't go without Feds' order. The flip-flop of flight date in this month, (see last message) also revealed she had to follow the Feds's instruction. From her behavior, I saw the shadow of Muhanmmad and Malvo,( the two convicts of DC sniper shooting case) They thought they worked for the Feds so they were safe. They didn't know anytime they could be sacrifice. Feds don't care.

236. Help puppet Bush (6/24)

There are two events in June which I think were arranged deliberately at this time.
One is the Michael Moore's "9/11 Fahrenheit" will open to public on 6/25. Which will give a negative image for Bush. If there is a big bombing taking place on 6/19 or a little later, then the film will be neglected by public.

Another event was the report issued by 911 investigation commision which said there is no credible evidence that Saddam and Al-Qaida had cooperated to attack US. The panel disputes Bush's reasons to invade Iraq. It was reported by media on 6/17. This, too, could be neglected if there was a big attack taking place on 6/19.

If there was really an attack happened, Inside Group needed not to worry about these negative event. Bush would once again become a "hero in terror war". And other information 911 panel released would help to inflame panic and indignation against Islamic people. When media repeatedly to broadcast the picture of the collapse of WTC and the voice of pilots of hijacked plane. The effect is same like they broadcast the film of beheading case. US government is very active to start a psychological war to its citizens. To prepare for more war in Mid-East.

But the planned attack didn't take place. I think it's because my analysis in message 232, 233 revealed their plot.

When the planned bombing didn't come to offset the negative influence of 911 panel's finding and Michael Moore's film "Fahrenheit 9/11", inside group came to help Bush.

1. Give out a poll to boost Bush. It's the old tactic. Poll is a tool Inside Group used to manipulte the mind of people.

Re: "Outlook on Iraq aiding Bush, Kerry loses lead from last poll
By Ron Hutcheson, Knight Ridder,
6/18/04, S.J.M.N.

Bush went from trailing Democratic Sen. John Kerry to leading slightly, 48 % to 46%.
The results of the latest Pew Research poll of 1,806 adults taken June 3-13. "

2. unusual support from rival on war with Iraq.
"McCain unites with Bush, shows support for Iraq war
By Elisabeth Bumiller, New York Times
6/19/04, S.J.M.N.

President Bush and his old political rival Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, shared a military stage Friday to present an unusual joint defense of the war in Iraq."

3. Support from Democratic leader

Former President Clinton has revealed that he continues to support President Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq .....

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/19/clinton.iraq/index.html

4. Justify Bush's Iraq war by Russia leader

Russia Warned U.S. About Iraq, Putin Says

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 19, 2004; Page A11

Russian President Vladimir Putin said yesterday that his intelligence service had warned the Bush administration before the U.S. invasion of Iraq that Saddam Hussein's government was planning attacks against U.S. targets both inside and outside the country.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53096-2004Jun18.html

The surface of Clinton proves when it touches the interest of inside group, there is no partism. All politicians serve for their master: inside group. What surprised me is they even push out Putin to protect Bush. How eager they tried to save their puppet when their designated plan failed to carry out.

One thing interesting if you have noticed the date that media reported the defense from these big shots. Which may prove my prediction of 6/19 is correct. When I read these news, I knew the "terror attack on 6/19" was cancelled or postponed or delayed. Otherwise inside group didn't need these defense. In their plan, an "terror attack" would boost Bush's fame, and of course, distract the attention to a framed case.

237. The June plot (6/29)

Though the "6/19 terror attack" failed to be carried out, other events show how Feds prepared to frame a case in June.

On 6/17, S.J.M.N. reported, "Board OKs merging sheriff, coroner offices. In a move aimed at saving money, Santa Clara County leaders on Wednesday approved a controversial plan to allow the sheriff's department to manage the coroner's office. But the merger worries opponents who believe it could create an extra layer of public mistrust toward law enforcement."

In message "170. Suspends Coroner (10/11)" I talked about how Feds plotted to oust the chief medical examiner Schmunk. Finally Feds got coroner's office under their control. It will help them to cover up the murder committed in the coming framed case.

On same day 6/17, local Chinese TV reported a Chinese dissenter, Peng Min, was arrested in Burma and was handed over to Chinese government. Peng Min favours to overturn Chinese government by violence. About a year ago(?), he appeared in a talk show of that TV station. In interview he called for people to join his orgnization. He said that he needed qualified personnel to fill the post of Defense Minister and etc. He offered three to four thousands dollars of monthly salary for these posts. The host of talk show asked him where did he got that much money. Of course, Peng Min would not reveal his financial source. By common sense, it was from intelligence.

Peng Min was arrested a short time before 6/17. He was charged of holding a large amount of forgery Chinese currency by Burmese police. He was delivered to Chinese government quickly. I think he was arranged there by intelligence. Peng Min might have thought he was working to overturn current Chinese government. He could never dream of that he became a chip in a secret deal and was sold by his host. He became a payment to Chinese secret police to exchange for a framed drug case D.O.J. wants.

It was similar to the framed case in April when my wife went to HongKong visiting her dying adopted father. For that case, US had deported one of China most wanted escaped corruptive official to China. FBI director Mueller also announced HongKong would be attacked by Al Qaida terrorists then. Now, Ashcroft and Mueller announced the coming summer attack by Al Qaida. And, too, they gave Chinese government one of their most wanted as interest exchange - a political dissenter.

Because US still holds a title of democracy which Bush used to "liberate" Iraq, Feds couldn't deport a political dissenter to China. So the secret deal was fulfilled by the third country-Burma. (see "222. Perform a secret deal (4/19), 223. FBI director said HongKong will be attacked (4/24)")

Former P.M. of Spain, Aznar was an ally of Bush. I alleged Madrid bombing was done to help his election. So, he should be familiar with these "terror attacks".
Here is an excerpt from an article:

Quote, "During his visit to California, Aznar referred more than once about a terrorist attack taking place in the United States in June, 2004, which would lead to a Federal Emergency Management Agency takeover of the U.S. (International Herald Tribune, May 15, 16, 17, Los Angeles Times, May 15)"

What made Aznar so sure there would be an "terror attack" in June? He might be able to access some inside information. I based on my own experience knew the mastermind is D.O.J. and their purpose is to eliminate a witness of their crime. For them this is a real imminent danger. Of course, to help their puppet Bush in election as well, too.

The above article is an interesting one, worth to read.

Quote, "Rogue Bush Backers prepare Super 9/11 False Flag Terror Attacks

INN Preview Exclusive -June 2

By Webster Griffin Tarpley

Toronto, May 30 - Intelligence patterns monitored over the US Memorial
Day weekend now point conclusively to an imminent new round of ABC
(atomic-bacteriological-chemical) terror attacks in the United States,"

http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=355


238. Manipulate Supreme Court (7/4)

Several times I talked about my allegations that Feds tried to force me out alone. On the purpose to eliminate me by unreasonable police search, arrest or police violence.

Re: "My immediate thought was that it proved my allegation they would use local policeman for a violent murder or arrest." (229. Unreasonable search and arrest (5/19))

"Forcing me out alone, or in a stranger's car, to encounter a police search, then a police violence or arrest. (230. Unreasonable search and arrest (2) (5/24))

When the planned 6/19 big arrest for a framed drug case was soured, they focused again in that tactic. Even activated their resource in Supreme Court. Two days later, on 6/21, by a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court ruled that "Larry Dudley Hiibel's constitutional rithts to be free of unreasonable arrest and to remain silent were not violated when Deputy Lee Dove arrested him for refusing to give his name after Dove stopped Hiibel and questioned him near Winnemucca, Nev., on May 21, 20000. "

Re: "Court: Police can require name
By Charles Lane
Washington Post

Washington - The Supreme Court on Monday(6/21/2004) upheld a state law that makes it a crime to refuse to tell the police one's name when stopped for suspicious behavior, a ruling that threngthens the ability of law enforcement officers to detain citizens even where they lack enough evidence for a full arrest."

This is not the first time I have such experience. Two years ago, Feds had used the same tactic. They tried to force me out by a Juror Somon. Then on 6/17/2002, the day I should have reported to court, media reported that Supreme Court ruled police can subtly pressure passengers to be searched in public transit systems.

I posted in late June 2002: "At night, I heard a news report from KTSF26 Chinese station that Supreme court ruled police can subtly pressure passengers on buses, trains and other public transit systems to agree to be searched, saying officers need not tell the riders they have a right to refuse." It was sensitive because I had to take public transit systems since I have no valid drive license.(see "71. Police violence")

I won't comment if it erodes civil liberty from "not tell the riders they have a right to refuse" to "Police can require name". It's a controversial one even in Supreme Court. (Vote 5 - 4) What I worried is D.O.J. can manipulate Supreme Court to rule on a case to justify a police search and arrest. What is the meaning for check and balance of three independent powers?

My wife came back from China on 6/26. A relative drove her home from air-port. He is the one who used to drive me for shopping when my wife refused to do so. When I read the news of Supreme Court rule, I immediately realized it's a tactic played by Feds. To do it, they must also stop others to help me. So they would intimidate this relative? I asked him for a shopping ride. Really he was very nervous to say he couldn't with a very reluctant reason. That he must go home to cook for his son. (His son is a doctor, the time is 2:30 pm, not the meal time.). This was the first time he refused me. I knew why. What pleased me a bit was that I could predict Feds' act.


239. Free factory (7/9)

To frame a case, Feds used to arrange a trip for the target to establish a regional link. I think they killed my father in law in March and gave my wife a free flight ticket so she could go to China in April. After I revealed it at "219. Free ticket and funeral urn (4/9)", they changed it into HongKong. (see 222, 223, 224, 225) I think there was a big drug deal happened at that time.

Then it was the plot of 6/19. (see 232, 233, 234) Because W.B.(my wife's brother) went to Fujiang for the burial too, I thought Feds framed a big case of multi-nations. How did they frame a drug case on him?

On 6/26, my wife came back from China and told me such a story. W.B. had a fortune that he got a factory for free. W.B. lives in Manila, Philippines. He has a machanic shop there. He is a skilled worker to produce mould. One of his customers suddenly abandoned his business, gave whole of his factory, and business relationship (business order) to W.B.. It is free. The factory produces plastic soles of shoe.

I don't believe there is free lunch. Especially it is an unusual big fortune. The free flight ticket my wife got and free factory her brother got seemed all related to make the framed drug case. The sole of shoe reminded me of the shoe bomber case two years ago. In which Feds said suspect Reid put explosive in his heel of shoe. I had alleged it's a framed case. The heel bomb is more like a 007 trick. Intelligence is interested in such trick. If they plant drug in the heel and frame a case, they can make a sensation. What they need to do now is only place an order to W.B.'s factory from China, and plant drugs in heel shipment. Then there will be a drug case.

Next day on 6/27, "World Journal" reported: "Chinese police and the DEA of Philippines coordinated to break up a big drug smuggling case. The member of drug gang were active in Fujian, China; Manila Philippines.....", another article talked about "Drugs came from southwest rigion which neighbor to Golden Triangle, the drugs to Fujiang is from South-East Asio." They placed Fujiang and Philippines in the center of drug trafficking. It was a psychological pre-propaganda, a tactic Feds always uses.

On 7/8, National security adviser Condoleezza Rice visited China and met top Chinese leaders. Same day, DHS chief Tom Ridge said in a news conference that according to "credible source", a large scale Al Qaida terrorist attack would take place aim to influence the president election. The whole thing resembles the April plot. Secret deal confirmed by high ranking officials. Then an attack was warned which in practice is used to distract the public attention on a framed case.

After the miscarriage of 6/19 plot, a new frame case is set up. In addition to China, they now bribed another nation - Philippines to join the framed case. To make it more deceivable.

240. Cover up (7/14)

In my thread, many times I talked about Feds response swiftly to cover up the flaw I revealed. They did same cover up work after I talked about the June plot.

1. In "237. The June plot (6/29)" I said "Former P.M. of Spain, Aznar was an ally of Bush. I alleged Madrid bombing was done to help his election."

On 7/12, newspaper reported:
"Italy wiretaps paint portrait of man alleged to be bombing mastermind.
By Elaine Sciolino and Jason Horowitz
New York Times
7/12, S.J.M.N.

Madrid, Spain - Terrorists are not usually talkers. But the man who calls himself the mastermind of the March 11 train bombings in Madrid is an exception." The man's name is Ahmed. His Italian cell-phone number was found in the address book of one man suspected of involvement in the plot. So Italian police tapped his phone. In the taped conversations, Ahmed calls himself "the thread behind the Madrid plot". .... It's this and other conversations led to his arrest. "

After Madrid bombing, Spanish police arrested 11 suspects. On 4/4, news reported "Train bomb suspects died in suicide blast.", "The core members of the group have been detained or died in collective suicide" include ringleader Fakhet. The case should be finished. How could be there another mastermind coming out in Italy?

Ahmed was arrested on 6/7, Mercury News reported it on 7/12. So it's a story released on purpose. I think it is used to remind people that Madrid bombing is done by Al Qaida to discredit my allegation "it was done to help Aznar's election." It's amazing Feds could continually push out mastermind one after another for their own purpose.

2. Tenet resigned on 6/3. Mercury News reported, "Bush is unlikely to nominate a permanent successor before the November election, Republicans said, because a confirmation battle this summer would attract more attention to the agency's assessments of Saddam Hussein's weapons." High ranking took no care to the dangerous situation that Ashcroft and Mueller warned. So I realized there would be no real terrorist attack but an attack from their own. I wrote message "233. CIA chief resigns (6/9)". In it I doubted how could a captain of a battleship let sonar operater leave when there is an alarm of submarine attack.

I think the following news is a cover up to that obvious flaw.

"Senators urge swift naming of new CIA chief.
...... that "during such a dangerous period for the US" it would be "unacceptable" to leave the job vacant until after the election." (S.J.M.N. Brief news 7/12/04)

3. In message '232. Terror attack and distraction (6/4)" I talked about the Homeland Security Dept. whose previledge of terror warning was neglected. I thought D.O.J. was the mastermind of terror attack which was planned to distract the attention of a framed drug case. The following news can be viewed as a repair to that flaw.

On 7/8, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said in a news conference that there is credible information there will be large scale Al Qaida terrorist attacks before November election.

This is a continuation of 5/26 terrorist attack warning of D.O.J.. Though they missed the plan of 6/19, they planned another one in near future.

241. Another plot in July (7/19)

Philippines government on 7/14 announced it would withdraw its troops from Iraq a month early in order to save the life of a hostage whom was kidnapped Several days ago. Washington opposed the action. On Tuesday(7/13), White House press secretary S. McClellan said, "A decision by the Philippine government to withdraw their 51 troops ahead of schedule would send the wrong signal to terrorists.".

I always think intelligence manipulate terrorist activities to provoke the war, to rig the election and to justify the occupation in Mid-east. I view the Philippine hostage event as another effort created to cover up the framed drug case. To make the framed drug case more deceivable, they used to make the countries which involved in plot a hostile one or in dispute. People would think, the countries were in diplomatic or military dispute, so it was impossible that their police force would coordinate to frame a case.

But secret police always take this psychological advantage to make case. I've talked about it in "193. Bombing Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia". The most evident one was the plot of drug case in June, 2001. When F.B.I. and D.E.A. had a secret deal with Chinese secret police to frame a drug case, they created the incident of air collision of spy plane in Hai Nang Island, China in April, 2001. Produced a military dispute.

South Korea, Japan all had the hostage beheading problem. These coutries are stronger than Philippine, yet they all obeyed to US and refused to withdraw their troops. Why Philippine behaved differently? I think because the framed drug case (see "239. Free factory") needs a "political dispute" as a cover up.

On same day, 7/13, Chinese TV reported that China strongly condemned Singapore Vice Premier Lee Xianlong's private visitation to Taiwan. China said it did not need an intermediator for its relationship to Taiwan. As a warning, the president of Chinese central bank cancelled his official visitation to Singapore. It's unusual. Lee Xianlong's father, former Singapore premier Lee Guangyao had visited Taiwan in same way before. China never said a word at it. Why this time it had a so aggressive response? Since it occurred at same time of Philippine troop withdrawal, I think it was a show. I had a feeling it might be part of that framing case. Newspaper propaganda the drug trafficking between Philippine, South east Asia and China. Add a Singapore will make the framed drug story more believable. But how did Feds link Singapore to me and my family? I went to bed with that puzzle.

Next day I got the answer. Dr. Wang, a cousin of my wife, also the son of my wife's adopt father whom passed away this April, (see "223. FBI director said HongKong will be attacked (4/24)") called my wife on 7/14 asked about flight tickets to Singapore. My wife arranged him two tickets on the coming weekend (7/16?). My wife told me Dr. Huang's wife has family members living in Singapore.

Dr. Wang's call proved my worry is not over sensitive. Feds did plan a multi-nations framed case. It would be a heavy weight case if they claimed it was broken up by the coordination of the law force of Philippine, Singapore, China and US. Though D.O.J. failed the plot of 6/19, they planned another one quickly designated to the week-end of 7/16.

242. Dr. Wang is a target (7/24)

Dr. Wang is a successful medical doctor. He lives in Hillsbrew, where the most residents are rich people. The security should be good in this area. But on 6/19, a house was intruded. One of the residends was killed and another one was seriously wounded. The TV repeatedly broadcast a heart shape necklace, emphasized it was a jewelry lost in that case. They successfully made it a burglar case.

On 7/14, when Dr. Wang called my wife for flight tickets to Singapore, I realized Feds would frame Dr. Wang in case too. I suddenly recalled the Hillsbrew killing case. It took place on 6/19. It resembles the first attempt frame case in 2001.

My young sister and brother in law was one of the main targets. So was their son, a student of Stanford University. In 2001 framed case, Feds might plan a shooting death for him. To make it look like a racial random shooting killing, they shot an Asia girl to death on 6/10/01, a day ahead of designated case date as a cover up. (See "63. A well planed frame case ".)

If the 6/19 plot was carried out, I think Dr. Wang's house would have been intruded too and he would have been killed as a victim in "a series burglar and killing cases".

Anyhow, 6/19 plan failed. And in message "239. Free factory (7/9)" I revealed that Feds made it a drug case of multi-nations in which Philippine was involved. They swiftly planned another one in which Singapore was the center of the case.

243. The late birthday party (7/24)

My daughter's birthday is in early June. Her summer vacation started on 6/1. Though she had plenty time to have a party on her birthday. She didn't.

It was about on 7/13, I learned that my wife would prepare a birthday party on 7/16 for our daughter. What made her so eager to have a late party 40 days after our daughter's birthday? When next day she arranged a flight (leaving on 7/16?) for her cousin, Dr. Huang, I knew Feds had a new plot on that week end.

Feds used to arrange a trip or party in their plot. A party will net as many people as they want, as far as I know. But what did they want in my daughter's birthday party? To net her classmates? I was puzzeled.

On 7/16, my daughter's classmates came in about 11 a.m.. They left at about 10 p.m. I locked myself in bedroom all the time. In noon, my computer was blocked to operate by virus. I was familiar with this tactic. I suddenly awared of that the real purpose of birthday party was to force me out alone. Usual I would have done so to let kids have a happy time without a feeling of being restricted. But now it was a different situation. Supreme Court passed rule to allow police to "ask name" and other "subtle tactics to press" on people. Though it seems a minor rule, the result could be a tragedy. There could be a shooting death. Police could be justify by "reasonable ask name" but the victim was un-cooperate and so on. It would be all their words because a dead couldn't speak up.

I stayed at room. Computer recovered for some time but in late afternoon was completely inoperative. I had to re-install the original software to clean the virus.

I believe if I had left home on that day, I would have been eliminated by a police search. Then there would be a multi-nations drug case out break. And with great possibility, followed by a big "terrorist attack" which announced on 7/8 by Tom Ridge of H.S.D..

244. Push for an aggressive case (7/29/04)

On 7/24, there was a first page article in Mercury News. Topic "Criticism mounting for federal prosecutor - Morale questions as caseload drops, By Howard Mintz"

It says that U.S. Attorney Kevin Ryan, the point man for the Bush administration's Justice Department in Northern California, "heads into his third year as the Bay Area's most powerful law enforcement official, the accolades have been eclipsed by serious questions about how aggressively he's filing new cases".

That "Mercury News review of Justice Department data shows that overall productivity is lackluster, especially when compared with other important U.S. attorney offices."

That "overall prosecutions in the Bay Area federal courts are well below Mueller's main years as U.S. attorney and in 2003 were near their lowest level since 1998, when the office hit rock bottom and then-U.S. Attorney Michael Yamaguchi was forced to resign."

The article came with charts of six years data of "cases prosecuted", "Defendants charged", " Felony cases filed" let out by D.O.J. to prove Ryan had a bad 2003 record. It is obviously an push to urge Atterney Ryan to file new big case aggressively. It is also an intimidation which hinted "forced to resign" if he failed to do so. Consider the situation I am in, I think it is direct on me. As a matter of fact, Ryan has done so already. The article says, "Ryan has beefed up the San Jose branch to 20 lawyers from the usual dozen or so, an unprecedented level."

How aggressive is it? Free flight ticket, free factory, Supreme Court ruling, killing in burglar case, Philippine hostage case, Singapore diplomat dispute with China, planned terror attack.....Feds activated their high ranking resources to frame big drug cases continually these days. When they failed to carry out these plots, they push U.S. Attorney who directly in charge of my case. I am familiar with this kind of push. See a similar one at: "67. Turn on into local police (5/29/2002)".

There is only three months left for election day. Inside group must do something to support Bush's campaign, or create some justification for a rigged election. If Feds can't start a "big terror attack", they at least must give Bush a prosperous economy which will cause a tight money market and rising financial interest.That will cause the break up of housing bubble. Which will hurt interest of Feds because they invested large in housing market in my case. This is why they are so anxious to plot to finish my case.

245. Framed case and "terror attack" (8/4)

The plot to frame a case is becoming frequently these days. It always planned with a terror attack as a distraction. I allege D.O.J. bribed China to frame a drug case. And I allege Feds murdered my father in law and my wife's adopted father in March and April to arrange trips for my wife to China and Hongkong in April and June. They used to arrange trips to establish a regional link in framed case.

1. On 12/20/2003, B's family (my brother in law) was arranged a trip to China. At same time, Homeland Security Dept. raised the terror alarm to orange code. Around that time, Bush rebuked Taiwan government and announced an order to ban the entry of corruptive officials which benefit China largely. I allege it was a secret deal between China and US.

See "191. Framing a case in December (12/26)", "206. Another interest exchange. (2/16)"

2. On 4/21/2004, my wife took an emergent trip to visit her adopted father whom got a stroke in HongKong and died later. At same time, in his trip from China, FBI director R. Mueller said Al Qaida would attack financial building of Hongkong.
On 4/13, Vice President Cheney visited China, President Bush echoed same day in a rare news conference that, ""America's word, once given, can be relied upon....." On 4/16, a Chinese most wanted corruptive official was deported to China by US agent. It was a confirmation and performance of the secret deal.

See, "222. Perform a secret deal (4/19)", "223. FBI director said HongKong will be attacked (4/24)"

3. On 6/19, B had a big party. At same time, my wife was in a trip in China to bury her father's urn. I allege a multi-nations drug case was framed then.(Philippines, China and US) For which, Ashcroft and Mueller announced terror attack in "coming summer" on 5/26.
On 6/17, TV reported that a China most wanted political dissenter was arrested in Burma and had been delivered to China.

See "232. Terror attack and distraction (6/4)", "237. The June plot (6/29)".

4. Another multi-nations drug case was framed on 7/16. (Singapore, China and US) This time Feds arranged a trip for Dr. Huang to Singapore, also arranged a birthday party for my daughter. For this case, Tom Ridge on 7/8 once again warned a "terror attack" in news conference.

See, "241. Another plot in July (7/19)", "242. Dr. Huang is a target (7/24)", "243. The late birthday party (7/24)"

5. On 7/30, White House speaker told media that from Air Force No.1, President Bush actively called President of China, Hu Jingtao. Bush repeated "one China" policy in the call. The speaker said it was a follow up activity after Condoleezza Rice's visitation to China. High ranking meetings used to come with secret deal, was there some new plot?

One day later on 8/1, Tom Ridge again alert the "terror attack" and raised the alarm code to orange color on specific financial area.

It is not a coincidence. After the intimidation on 7/24 in Mercury News, US Attorney Ryan must have worked aggressively to frame a case. Bush's call might be a signal to China to start the new case. We have seen such style before. And Taiwan's interest may be an exchange in this deal. (done by Condoleezze Rice)

Of course, a "terror attack" is always planned as a distraction for the framed case. The only difference is this time D.O.J. targets at financial group. It was probably an intimidation: "Don't raise interest rate too quick.We have big interest in housing market."

Interest rate, housing market, employment rate, President election, terrorist attack, a framed drug case, secret deal between China and US, there is a relationship between them. That's why as November coming, there is a so intense warning of "terror attack". It's not only an intimidation as someone thinks. It will be a real one if D.O.J. fulfills their frame case successful.

246. Aggressive work (8/9)

1. Attempt to frame case with porn pictures

A fake posted forgery messages which assumed my name. It has happened before. (see "127. Heavy harassment (5/3/03)") The recent one is:
" I am a homosexual slant-eye gook who loves republican politics ! <posts/421.html> --- kathaksung ( 07/30/2004, 18:35:09 ) ( 308 bytes )"

The fake also posted several messages with porn pictures. One in this thread:
"...But not the same things I do! <posts/64.html> --- kathaksung ( 04/27/2004, 00:51:18 ) ( 208 bytes ) img 5"

Last week when I read a message I realized it can leads to serious result.

Re: WASHINGTON, March 19, 2002
(CBS) The FBI says it expects to arrest at least 50 more people by week's end as it busts up an Internet child-pornography ring that allegedly included two Catholic priests, six other members of the clergy, a school bus driver and at least one police officer.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/03/18/national/main503982.shtml

Now I know why the fake posted porn pictures assuming my name. And why my complaints were neglected and even been moved away. People must register to post with a password in that web-site. Obviously only Feds has the motive and ability to manipulate things like that. You can see the forgery thread assuming my name at:

http://www.anyboard.net/et/music/rap/posts/392.html

About that time and late my wife push me to use broadband instead of a single telephone line. Since what she did always came with a shadow of Feds, I refused. Now I understand why. Porn picture with user's name was not enough to arrest a person. They need a broadband, so Feds can post porn picture from my site when I surf in Internet. That's the evil tactic how they plant.

2. Car link

On 8/7, a family drove their car to my house. They were customers who bought a 7 days trip. My wife drove them to the spot where travel bus would pick them up. Their car will park at my house until they finish the trip. Twice Feds has used the same tactic to establish a link by car in framed case. To plant drug is as easy as to plant porn pictures by assuming victim's name. When Feds are pushed by high ranking officials and exhausted their tricks, they have to repeat the old tactic. Each time they arranged the car being parked at my house it always took a week. Is that the time needed for framing a drug case, applying for a warranty to search and arrest from a judge?

See the two similar events at: "117. Swift response (3/10/03)", "212. Link to car (3/9/04)"

247. Russia and terror attack (8/14)

On 5/26/04, Ashcroft and Mueller announced "terror attack in coming summer". On 6/4, in message 232, I alleged D.O.J. was the hand behind the coming attack to distract a framed drug case. I also predicted "And the time will be around 6/19."

On 6/19, Washington Post reported Russian leader Putin said his intelligence in 2002 had warned US that Iraq government planned to attack US. This news, combined with others, were used to fix the gap of soured "6/19 terror attack", enabled me realizing the attack was postponed. It also proved my allegation of secret deal between US and Russia.

On 6/10/2002, Ashcroft announced Padilla's arrest in Moscow. What made US Attorney General to give out such a news in a foreign capital? Five days later, on 6/15, in message "68, Re 7. Padilla and OKC bombing (6/15)", "Re. 9. Ashcroft in Moscow" I alleged a "terror attack" would be done to US. I wrote,"Or probably there will be a big terror attack which government had said,"Bombing is inevitable.".

One month later in message"77. The payment of deal(July/02)" I wrote, "It must be benefit to FBI because Ashcroft was involved.", "If so, US people still will suffer another attack-a dirty bomb attack. When they want to demand more from people. Either for election, or for the support of war on Iraq, or against criticism of failure intelligence.....it's their choice."

What the role Russian would have played was a witness if the attack had happened. If Russian said they knew Saddam had planned such an attack, and had informed US in advance. People of the world would believe it. Because at that time, Russia seemed to be more friendly with Iraq than US. Russia opposed US war policy in UN convention.

Putin's defense in 6/19/2004 for Bush was only a performance of that secret deal of June/2002. That's why I was surprised when I heard it.
In which you can see a time accord. Re: "The report, which cited an unidentified intelligence agent, said Russian intelligence had received information in early 2002 that Iraq was planning an attack against the United States. "This information was more than once passed on to our U.S. partners in oral and written form in the fall of 2002,"". (Washington Post, 6/19/04)

As I said, the secret deal was done in early June, 2002. The bribe of the secret deal was paid to Russia in later June. Then we could see today that "the information from Russia in oral and written form passed to US in the fall of 2002." They could cheat people anything. But the action could only be carried out after the deal.

What was the fall of 2002? In October that year, a sniper shooting spree pushed law makers passed the Bill to authorize the use of armed force against Iraq. Bush got the war power; About same time, a French oil tanker was bombed; There was also a Bali bombing which killed nearly 200 people, most of them Australians. A push for the two countries to support for the war against Iraq. What Bush needed was an "Iraq terror attack" to justify the invasion. A Russia oral and written form of information would make the case credible.

For some reason, the plot to plant a terror attack on Iraq was soured. I think my revelation in advance played a role on it.


248. Secret deal and payment (8/19)

1. In April 2001, an US spy plane EP-3 collided with a Chinese fighter above the South sea of China. An article said a secret deal was reached for releasing the spy plane and its crew.
It said in secret deal, officials of FBI and DEA were the signatories and guarantors. Why FBI and DEA involved in a diplomatic and military event? I then concluded it's a secret deal between Feds and Chinese secret police in the name of settlement of EP-3 plane. The real deal was to frame a drug case to demolish a witness of the crime of D.O.J. committed.

I was puzzled quite a while at the amount of payment for that deal. The article said it was 40 billion dollars. That was a big amount. How could Feds have that much money? I had the answer a few months later. It was an economic benefit equivalence. Later that year, China was granted to host Olympic 2008 and was approved to be a member of WTO. Media said it would benefit China billions of dollars worth. Now we could see the result. The economy of China had a big leap forward since then. China now is the sixth big economy power in the world. The worth of payment exceeds far from 40 billion dollars.

2. On 6/10/2002, Ashcroft announced the arrest of Padilla in Moscow. In a message on 6/15 I alleged there was a secret deal between D.o.J
. and Russia that there would be a "terror bombing" to US. As usual, there always was a payment for the secret deal.

The bribe paid quickly this time. Because the demand of Iraq war was urgent. Same month on 6/27 in the meeting of G-8 in Canada, Russia was granted 20 billions of dollars within 10 years in the name of demolishing its WMD. Russia was also granted to host G-8 in 2006 which meant it was approved to be a partner of G-7.

What Russia was requested to do was to pass information to US intelligence in oral and written form that Iraq planned to attack US in the fall of 2002.(That's what we outsiders are able to know so far due to the 6/19/04 news release. Russia might have done more to plant.) The purpose was to frame Iraq as mastermind in a "terror attack" to US.

The planned "terror attack" soured for some reason. US bought the ticket but didn't go to the theater. So when it wanted to see the film again, it had to buy another ticket. So secret deal repeated.

3. Since my continual revelation of secret deal, now they put relevant figures and news in inconspicuous place.

Re: "5/17/2004 (S.J.M.N. brief news)
Rice pleased with talks on Iraq policy

The US and Russia are now" on the same page "regarding the future of Iraq despite disputes,"... national security adviser Condoleezza Rice met in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the weekend to discuss next stage in the Iraq occupation..."

Re: "5/22/2004 (S.J.M.N. brief news)
Moscow signals support for long-stalled treaty

Russia signaled Friday that it would ratify the Kyoto climate-change treaty in exchange for European support for its bid to join the World Trade Organization."

I alleged another secret deal was done and the payment this time is WTO. (US opened green light for it) The plot had a tight schedule. Ten days later on 5/26, D.O.J. (Ashcroft and Mueller) announced the "coming attack in summer". On 6/19, when the plot soured, to take maximum advantage of the deal, they still let Putin give a news that Russia knew Iraq had planned to attack US. To save Bush's fame and also to prepare for the next plot in July.

249. Secret deal and July plot (8/24)

The partners of the secret deal were Russia and China. Russia would prove Iraq had planned to attack US. China would frame a drug case for D.O.J.. These two countries were chosen because they had been hostile to US in cold war so the framed case would be believable if proved by them.

The hand behind US is D.O.J.. Attorney General Ashcroft, chiefs of FBI, DEA were involved. Other high ranking officials, like President Bush, V.P. Cheney, National Security Adviser Rice are only puppets, worked for D.O.J.

The first secret deal (EP-3 spy plane's case on Apr. 2001) was signed in written form. That's why both directors of FBI and DEA resigned. Because there was evidence. To avoid more resignation, the later deals were all in oral form and were made in partner's Capital. As we saw that Ashcroft in Moscow (6/10/02); Cheney in Beijing (4/13/04) Mueller in Beijing (4/20/04 ?) Rice in Moscow (5/15/04) Rice in Beijing (7/8/04). And we heard Bush passed confirmation that, "America's word, once given, can be relied on....". They acted like Mafia. ( see #245)

I had revealed these secret deals. So they sent Condoleezza Rice for the mission. She was female and was less noticeable. Her trip to Moscow in May was in a low key. D.O.J. probably thought it was a success. After the failure of 6/19 plot, they again planned a multi-nations drug case on 7/16 and sent Rice to Beijing to deal with China.

Rice met with top Chinese leaders on 7/8. On same day, Tom Ridge warned a large scale attacks from Al Qaida. On 7/13, US expressed regret on Philippines' early withdrawal of its troops in Iraq. Same day, China condemned Singapore for its leader's visiting to Taiwan. Next day, China warns US on policies.

Re: Beijing Says Stances on Taiwan, Hong Kong May Hurt Relations
By Glenn Kessler, Washington Post Staff Writer, July 14, 2004;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47742-2004Jul13.html

All these were the psychological pre-praparation for the framed drug case. It would make the framed drug case look more credible because all the countries involved having diplomatic conflicts. To divert public's attention there would be large scale terror attacks followed. (see #241, 242, 243)

250. Signature (8/24)

My threads were locked, or moved away, or even been banned from some sites recently. The reason they used was ridiculous, such like because I posted in many other sites. (will library ban you because you go to other libraries?) One reason they used was the thread is lack of discussion. Here is a typical one:

Re: "An Error Has Occurred!Sorry kathaksung, you are banned from using this forum! Reason: No interaction http://www.policeworld.net/forums/index.php

It is because the people were intimidated from my thread. Agent called those people who read my messages and warned them. I knew this for some time.

When I first started to post three years ago, people still could discuss with me. In a debate, one person wrote, "I knew you. Somebody told me about you, you are anti-US......". From then on, I knew Feds called people who read my thread. No others could be this "somebody" than agent. And no others than Feds could scare people away from reading and discussing on my thread. What have they told people of me? A spy, a drug dealer, or a criminal? It's all their words. Many times, e-mail informed me there was a reply to my post. But when I got there, the reply was deleted already. Either done by agent or done by author whom was intimidated by agent.

Intimidation is a tactic used frequently by FBI. Here is a recent one.

Quote, "F.B.I. Goes Knocking for Political Troublemakers
By Eric Lichtblau
New York Times

Monday 16 August 2004

WASHINGTON, Aug. 15 - The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been questioning political demonstrators across the country, and in rare cases even subpoenaing them, in an aggressive effort to forestall what officials say could be violent and disruptive protests at the Republican National Convention in New York."

So I decide to post a signature to reveal it. But I failed to add a signature in my profile.

Re: "An Error Has Occured! You are not allowed to change this person's profile."

http://www.reviewjournal.com/messageboards/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=;action=profile

The failure to post in my own profile only recovered after I posting signature manually. When they realize tech problem can't stop I post it.

If Feds call you and defame me, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

So you didnt go to the discovery channel

I can't believe that DML let's all of this paranoid and delusional crap stand without challenge.

Did my articles hurt you that much? Do you belong to S.S.G. team monitor this web site?

------------

251. Mortgage rate and September plot (8/29)

In message "245. Framed case and "terror attack" (8/4)" I talked about Bush passed a signal to China that US was ready for another framed case on 7/30, and Ridge raised alarm code in some financial area to orange colour on 8/1. I pointed out it was an intimidation from D.O.J. to financial group not to raise interest rate too quick because Feds have a large investment in real estates.

I think my revelation was very accurate. We can see since then there was a confusion. Feds hurried throwing out a case that they arrested an Al Qaida man in Pakistan. In his computer they found the chart of those financial buildings. Feds justified the terror warning by this information. And then the information was revealed being four years old; and then the news said information was renewed half year ago; and then we knew the arrested Al Qaida computer expert was an informant.Informant? So Feds could explain in the way whatever they wanted to.

But as I said in message on 8/4, "It was probably an intimidation: "Don't raise interest rate too quick.We have big interest in housing market." Although Federal Reserve still raised the benchmark interest rate a quarter point on 8/10, the interest of Bonds went in opposite direction: downwards. Because it is linked to home mortgage rate.

In a report on 8/21, World Journal said, "Despite the Federal Reserve Bank has raised the interest rate, the rate of home mortgage loan, instead, is sliding downwards. In July, the interest rate of 30 years' fixed mortgage loan was between 6.21% to 5.98%. But this week, it descends to 5.81%."

The conflict way of rising prime rate vs dropping home loan rate proves what I said is right. The terror bombing intimidation works. The financial group who controls market, have to give way to the interest of Feds. Which creates a strange phenomenon: The rate of home loans drops while the main interest rate is rising.

Then what happens to 9/21, the next date when Federal Reserve will have another meeting and likely to raise the benchmark rate another quarter of point? The contradictory mortgage rate can't maintain too long.

As usual, Feds frame new drug cases and arrange parties. It almost becomes routine for them recently. One is on 9/2, my father's birthday. The other one is Dr. Wang's wife's birthday. ( I had spelled Dr. Wang as Dr. Huang in message 241, 242. I only knew his legal name should be Wang when I saw his invitation note a few days ago.) Feds make it a big one. My wife has booked hotel rooms for Dr. Wang's relatives from Singapore for the party. Feds tries to net as many people as possible.

It's convenient to frame a drug case. Secret police are skilled for it. China and US has practised for years. Singapore and Philippines are the new partners.

252. Saddam and secret deal (9/4)

In April, a news in Internet said American authorities arranged a meeting of the former Iraqi dictator with his wife.

Quote, "The outcome of their meeting turned out to be quite scandalous. Sajina claims that the person she encountered was not her husband, but his double."

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=711

Then I learned the visiting was requested by Russians.

Re: "Mrs Saddam says Saddam is not Saddam
Joe Vialls | June 18 2004

After the Russians applied enormous diplomatic pressure, America was finally obliged to allow Sajida Heiralla Tuffah access to her husband in Qatar.....
Sajida entered the prison, emerging only moments later pink with rage and shouting, "This is not my husband but his double. Where is my husband? Take me to my husband".

American officials rushed forward to shield Mrs Saddam from perplexed Russian observers, trying to insist that Saddam had changed a lot while in custody and she probably didn't recognise him. .... "You think I do not know my husband?" Sajida shouted furiously, "I was married to the man for more than twenty-five years!" Then she stormed off, never to return.

This remarkable confrontation was reported by Pravda and four other newspapers in the east between 13 and 17 April, but the New York Times and others made damn sure you didn't read or hear about it in the west. After all, this was an integral part of Wall Street's psychological campaign to convince the public that America was "Winning the War", so please to send more sons and body bags to Iraq."

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/june2004/061804saddamnotsaddam.htm

When I first saw this news, my first thought was that Saddam was dead already. The puzzle was why US arranged such a meeting.

Why it's not German or French but Russian had such a request? Why Russian was so interested to know the true identity of "Saddam in custody"? Why US authority gave Russian such a privilege that they particularly arranged a meeting of Saddam and his wife for the Russian observers?

Putin's announcement on 6/19/04 that Iraq had planned to attack US resolved all these puzzle.
US team for the secret deal request Russia President Putin to deliver the information to public personally. So the framed case would look credible. (Or the so said "terror attack" wronged Saddam as mastermind.) Russian President cared about his own reputation if the lie would be revealed. To assure Russian it would be safe to tell a lie, US arranged such a meeting to prove Saddam was dead already. The "Saddam" in custody was only a double. Then we see Russian observers watching Saddam's wife visited her husband in April. Condoleezza Rice went to Moscow in May (to confirm the deal) Then D.O.J. announced the "summer terror attack" in later May. Though the June "terror attack" soured, Putin still delivered the news that Iraq had planned to attack US.

As a matter of fact, Saddam had been US ally in 1980's. US had supported Iraq with bio-chemical material in "Iran-Iraq war." Saddam must have known many secret deal between Iraq and US. They won't keep him alive.

253. September plot (9/9)

In "251. Mortgage rate and September plot (8/29)" I talked about Feds arranged another framed drug case in September before 9/21 when Federal Reserve likely will raise the benchmark interest rate another quarter of point. They arranged two big party on 9/2 and 9/18.
The following is what happened around 9/2.

1. On 9/2, I was harassed by Internet attack. Slow procession; losing connection to Internet; Window being occupied by popped up frames......, in about an hour, I spent most time to struggle against various tech. problem and could only post two messages to the web-site. At last, I had to abandon the effort. I realized it was 9/2. Feds designated it for an action. They tried either blocking me to report in Internet what happened or forcing me out to join my father's birthday party. Of course, I wouldn't go to that party in San Francisco.

2. On 9/4, World Journal reported, "San Francisco prosecutors and police collaborated to arrest 12 drug offenders". " On 9/3, San Francisco City announced the arrest of drug suspects......On 8/19 Police had arrested several people whom involved in the case, the rest whom involved in were arrested on 9/2...... Mayor said, the action is just the beginning, not end." I think if I had attended my father's birthday party, the title of that news would have been much bigger. Feds made the 9/3 announcement a big one when Mayer, chief of police and general Attorney of San Francisco all presented. The original purpose of 9/2 arrest targeted at me and people who knew my story. And of course, it's not the end, Feds prepared another big party which will be held in San Francisco on 9/18."

3. Just days before 9/2, a Chinese film "Hero" went public in US theaters. It was the best sell film in early September. The value of booking office overpassed tens of million dollars. "Hero" is a production of China state running company. It went to public three years ago. US distributer held it in the hand for more than a year. So the time it went public was not a coincidence. I allege it was a part of payment to China for framing a drug case.

4. In five days' weather forecast on 9/1(S.J.M.N.), I had the high temperature: 9/1: 82
9/2: 78; 9/3: 95; 9/4: 100; 9/5: 97;. The high temperature used to be in the range of 80's in August. The sudden jump to upper 90's alarmed me. I noticed the turning point was on 9/2.
To my experience, Feds used to change weather to help their case. Why they need a hot weather this time? I got the answer on 9/6. At that day, twice the power supply to my house was broken up. Feds created a heat climate to justify the outage of power supply. In previous attempted framed drug cases, twice they cut the power supply. One was in 8/14/03, they made it a big one. There was a great blackout in New York and north-east America. The other one was in 12/20/03 in San Francisco. I alleged the purpose was to disable the alarm system, either to loot or to plant. Feds used to let out a pre-propaganda to justify unusual phenomenon by media. So this time we saw in Mercury News: " Power demand peaked at 45,597 megawatts Wednesday(9/8)...... Until this year, the state's record for power use was 43,609 megawatts, set in July 1999." (S.J.M.N. 9/9/04)

And they made it a covert one. Media rarely talked about the recent high temperature for days.Each day's high temperature was about 96 degree, almost always a degree below the history record. Could they control it so accurately to one degree below the record or they just manipulate the figure? History temperature record was made in different years, but one degree below history record was almost made by a consecutive days period. So, it's still unusual.

Feds also made it a long one. From 9/3 to today it is one week already. Mercury News said the temperature record was not broken. But "The recent heat wave is only unusual for how long it has loomed, says National Weather Service forecaster Steven Anderson. "It prolonged past the normal three to four days," Anderson says."

It seems Feds will prolong it further, or repeat the heat on another date - 9/18, the next party date. They are in a hurry. They have big pressure from D.O.J. (The unusual weather could return to normal after my revelation as Feds used to do cover up job.)

See blackout at: "191. Framing a case in December (12/26)", "167. The frame case is going on (9/26)"


254. Possible regime change of Taiwan. (9/14)

In last message I alleged Feds used film income as part of payment. But tens millions of dollars is not enough for a framing case. In 2001 case they paid an equivalence of 40 billions of dollars. In Dec. 2003, the payment is mainly political in which Bush banned the corruptive officials to enter US and firmly rebuked Taiwan for its intention of independence. What will be the payment for this case? I think it's Taiwan, again.

There was a president election in Taiwan on 3/20/04. National Party(N.P.) and Democrat Progress Party(D.P.P.) are the two rivals. D.P.P. is a strong advocate of Taiwan independence.
Thus it is the most dislike of Chinese government. Since D.P.P. performed badly in past four years ruling of Taiwan, general opinion was D.P.P. would lose the election at a 10% margin.

On 3/19/04, one day before the election, Taiwan president Chen Shui Bian and Vice president Lui Show Lian(both are D.P.P.) were shot in a campaign parade. The rival National Party, shocked at the incident, canceled the last minute campaign rush. D.P.P., on the contrary, activated all their propaganda, accusing this was a political assassination from opposition. D.P.P. won the next day election at a slight majority - a 0.2% victory.

When Taiwanese recovered from the shock and knew the truth of shooting, they protested. The bullets were hand made. Both president and vice president were shot but the wound were miraculously slight that they even went on the campaign for sometime. It was more like a conspiracy to cheat sympathetic votes than an assassination. The rival party put the case into the court.

On 4/9, the famous criminal appraiser, Dr. Li Chong Yue( I don't know his English name) went to Taiwan to investigate the evidence of that shooting. Dr. Li is an authority in criminal investigation. People believe it was his testimony in O.J.Simpson's case that quited Simpson from guilty in his wife's murder case.

Dr. Li had a news conference on 8/28 in which he announced his investigation report. Dr. Li emphasized that because the powder was not strong enough, the gun was a home made one. And the wounding part were not lethal. He absolutely excluded the shooting was a political assassination. He said, the "3/19 shooting" was a strange case he had ever heard of. It was historical because "President and vice president" were shot at the same time, and the weapon was a home-made gun. "Dr. Li has connection with chiefs of US intelligence from time to time. It was said the counterpart of US had concerned Dr. Li about the development of "3/19 investigation". Dr. Li also confirmed that US had "unofficially" taken care of this case." (referred from "Overseas Newspaper, Week-end, 9/5/04)

There was another news from Taiwan. The General Attorney of Taiwan, Mr. Lu Ren Fa was disappointed at Dr. Li's news conference. He said Dr. Li had promised to keep his investigation report confidential. He didn't know what made Dr. Li broke his promise.

It was not a coincidence that on 8/25, the Legislative Council of Taiwan passed a resolution to establish an "Independent Commission of 3/19 shooting investigation". Dr. Li's announcement would direct this "Special Mission" to go on the road of "not a political murder". Which eventually can lead to a regime change.

3/19 shooting case was same thing like 3/11 Madrid bombing. All aimed at election. They were done by intelligence. I think US intelligence were the hands behind it. The sad thing is, once it touches the interest of US intelligence, anytime the beneficiary could become a sacrifice.

Condoleezza Rice made deal with China in early July. It took some time to arrange for an "Independent Mission" in Taiwan's Legislation. But all were ready in later August for the September plot. They made it an extraordinary big one. Big shots of San Francisco gathered for that case on 9/3. (and possibly 9/18) It will be a multi-nation one. China, Singapore, possibly Philippines will be involved. This plot designed to fulfill before 9/21, the date Greenspan is going to raise the interest rate.

255. Development of message 254 (9/19)

On 9/18, Mercury News reported, "Official denies data leaks to Taiwan
(New York Times)

Keyser, a senior adviser to Secretary of State Colin Powell on Chinese issues, was charged Wednesday with not reporting a secret side trip he made to Taiwan last year during an official government trip to Japan, and officials say they suspect that he passed delicate information to Taiwanese contacts in Washington."

TV broadcast the picture of agents in "FBI" jacket working on the scene (arrest?). It also broadcast the shot when Keyser contacted two Taiwanese intelligence officials. Keyser denied he had shared any classified information with the Taiwanese. He said the document he gave to Taiwanese was "Talking points". According to senior officials, it was common in diplomatic practice. The high ranking officials of Taiwan said that it's hard to imagine FBI would beat the drum on such an event. They thought there was some other thing behind it. But they didn't know what was the motive.

I know what is it. It was the result of my last message. On 9/14, I alleged that to a secret deal, Intelligence would conduct an investigation of 3/19 presidents' shooting case of Taiwan which will at last cause a regime change in Taiwan. Though the news made it vague on the date Keyser was arrested, I found Wednesday was 9/15, the day next to my revelation.

The two events they charged Keyser were past tense. Keyser's trip to Taiwan took place last year; his delivery of document took place on 7/31. He was under surveillance and the scene was pictured. It was the best chance to make an arrest then, but FBI didn't. Why did they do it on 9/15?

Intelligence tries to justify their attempt to change regime of Taiwan. The arrest of Keyser gives people an impression Taiwan is doing espionage work in US. It also could block the mouth of people who are pro-Taiwan. It was done in a hurry. Just like when I pointed out it was an intimidation to financial group when Feds raised the terror alarm code to orange color in certain financial area in August, they hurried throwing out an "Al Qaida computer expert" to justify the action. The arrested expert was an informant as finally revealed. This time, too, after I revealed the plot of D.O.J., they picked up a man who was already under surveillance to create an espionage-like case. Despite how reluctant the case is. It was a cover up case for the secret deal. It was a swift reaction to my revelation as they always do.

256. Old tactic repeats (9/24)

After my continual revelation of September plot, the framed international drug case seemed to be canceled or postponed.

On 9/17 Mercury News reported, "West Nile sickens S.J. man, Illness is first to be reported in Bay Area." West Nile, meningitis are the common excuses Feds used to cover up the murder case of brain death. (Mad cow disease is the one they tried to introduce in. They haven't done so is because it will cause a turbulence in society, I think.) My first thought when I read this news was that Feds turned the international murder plot into regional murder plot.

My opinion was confirmed right the same day. That night, my wife once again demanded to install another phone line. The reason she gave was she wanted to go INTERNET for ticket booking when she was off work. She said she would have to stay in office late at night to finish extra booking work. She threatened that if there was not another phone line she would quit her job. I was surprised at her irrational dispute. If there is really so much business that she has to work at night at home, it should be her boss' duty to expand the workforce. The problem should be resolved between she and her boss, not for me. If you are an employee, are you willing to work several extra hours each day at your home, at your own cost, for your boss without pay?

And I pointed out to my wife, she could go Internet any time at night because I rarely use computer at that time. I used to do kitchen work, watch TV news, and read newspaper at that time.

It was not the first time my wife behaved so strange about a phone line like this. Last time was later last year. (see "183. Imminent threat (11/23)". "184. Jobless recovery (12/1)" in which I alleged the motive was to frame a "spamming case" or Internet crime case) At that time she threatened to devoice, this time she threatened to quit the job. All in the name to voluntarily work extra time for the company.

But is there such a demand? The only time she touched a computer at home was 2 years ago (?) when she got a laptop from her brother. She checked a software to see if it works on that laptop. She never touches computer at home since.

The hysteria of my wife reflects the anxiety of Feds and the huge pressure applied on them from D.O.J.. The plots and persecution in this year were so intensify that they came one after another without gap. After the framed international drug case was revealed, old tactic was picked up again. And after all it's the pressure of rising interest rate which Feds has checked successfully so far. They are hurried to finish my case so they can release the real estates they hold in my case before the break out of a housing bubble.

follow up to 256. (9/29)

My wife suddenly said she will take a fun trip to Korea next week. It's conflict to what she said she was very busy and had to do overtime work at home just a week ago. I don't know how she can have the vacation for the trip because in April and June, she went to HongKong and China. (Her father and adopted father died then) I can only speculate it may be another trick planned by Feds. They are in a hurry. They frame case one after another. Despite how unreasonable it is.

Maybe you should seek help for the delusions, I had a friend that was much like yourself for years, turned out he was bipolar.