Who's Online
0 registered (), 75 Guests and 40 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Advertisement
Shout Box

Newest Members
Nakeshahendry, liburano, sabannation15, o0CanIbuS0o, bigbore
38666 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Doobie_Brother 118
weedmen 84
Chris628 82
kenny_canuck 80
rasta 75
Forum Stats
38666 Members
55 Forums
183232 Topics
1649108 Posts

Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Advertisement
Page 4 of 29 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28 29 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#1535506 - 05/16/09 09:31 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: chrisbennett]
bud oracle Offline
Veteran
**

Registered: 06/05/08
Posts: 1309
Loc: Vancouver
It's so good that you have advice based on your judgment based on me.

All I can see is that your famous name is also considered rediculous by many and after the long time that I have seen it, your real accomplishments are hard to put a finger on.

First off I am truly tired of negative Judgmental self centered conformists who don't get much except fame for themselves all wrapped up in pseudo activism driven by commercialism.

It seems like I have heard of you for decades. Still you haven't been received with the respect and deference that Robin and I have been on behalf of our cause, formally by the government of Canada. I don't see any of your declarations/words in the record of parliament.

Just remember that you friggen bigshot, this guy in a clown suite was there where you haven't been yet. Is there a bit of jealousy in this perhaps?


One thing Chris in any election I run in, more people take me seriously than the so call bigshot well dressed conformist commercial well financed activists and that is a fact. Check out the published results.

Thanks for the respect for my accomplishments you jealous prick.

Yes I know your kind as they walk by and throw me a glance of judgmental disapproval. they think that their opinion is the one everyone holds. The reason i love wearing the hat is because it automatically weeds outs the denigrating pricks and sends them scooting on their way, without getting me all pissed off with their moronic hateful insults, freeing up my time and leaving my happy mood intact to chat with the many more pleasant people who have fun and laughter in their hearts.

Ten minutes of speaking with anyone and no one takes me as a fool.

People have given me more stars of approval than they have you in a much shorter time on this forum. You take your opinion and broadcast it, because in it everyone can see the metal you are made of Chris. That is also a fact isn't it? And in your opinions we can all see why you have no success or following.

Well that was before the editor reduced my stars of approval. What a hokie deal that is eh.

There will be an accounting by something more powerful than us. Can you tell me why there are so many fewer people visiting this forum then a few months ago? Are more people getting the drift and leaving the fraudsters behind in this recession?

Watch us Chris we are already at a spot in our journey in only a few months than you have dreamed of being. And don't join us in your centered wisdom, we don't need nay sayers and attack freaks in our society. We need happy people who have a touch of optimist in their hearts. For every prick like you who stays awy we will have dozens of happy people willing to pitch in.

Watch us Chris and spin your wheels with Kirk all you want you will look good to me getting shot down again while begging for attention.


Edited by bud oracle (05/16/09 09:57 AM)

Top
#1535521 - 05/16/09 10:42 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: bud oracle]
chrisbennett Offline

Ganja God
***

Registered: 06/21/00
Posts: 7136
Loc: Vancouver, BC
Stars? Talk about ego. Haha, can you count? who cares about stars? Nice to meet the true Bud Oracle.... that didn't take long.

"There will be an accounting by something more powerful than us."

Well there be an accounting of forum stars when that happens? I better sweeten my tone on here then, Lol.

Honestly, from the bottom of my heart, I wish you the best of luck Bud.
_________________________
Author www.forbiddenfruitpublishing.com, Shop Owner www.urbanshaman.net

Top
#1535525 - 05/16/09 10:54 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: chrisbennett]
OhYesWeCannabis! Offline
Enthusiast
**

Registered: 04/06/09
Posts: 278
Bud.....what the hell?

Maybe its your drivel causing the lower numbers?
I also spoke to the justice committee.....so what?

Big deal

You maybe should lay off the bug juice a bit and realize you to are no one....even less to some......just like a lot of us

Your ego is way over the top and your last post a joke

I hate to say it but I agree with bennet this time


Stars hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa......that says a lot
I was wondering when the hammer would come down as bennet was being nicer than I could remember seeing for a while..LOL

bizarre
by the way buddy
I do see shavluk who has been banned so many times here even I cant remember all the names he has been here but now even he has 5 stars when he never had more than two the whole time he really posted here


again ....so what and big deal... who cares...unless it is really just about you bud in which case I would watch for less stars for you instead of more



where do these guys come from????????

Robin you caused this hahhahhahahhahha


bud barnacle is your doing

Top
#1535527 - 05/16/09 11:13 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: chrisbennett]
Jack A. Roe Offline
Stoner
*

Registered: 10/06/08
Posts: 511
Loc: The Land
".....Hmmm sounds much more like an ego trip rather than a psychedlic one."

Every Parliament/Legislature has some officer charged with giving or not giving assent to its legislative acts. This officer must be one, not many, for then what if 1/2, 2/3, 4/5, 11/12, etc. give assent?

There is still a democratic apparatus to the Society---members temporal may introduce bills at parliament upon notice. It's simply that there's also an executive/judicial apparatus.

You seem to enjoy judging, Chris, and one act of our next Parliament may be a Provincial Court Act to constitute a Provincial Court of Justice. Would you like to be a puisne Judge of that court?

"My advice to all is to steer clear of that Ship of Fools and its whacky Captain!"

So you prefer the Good Ship Canada whose officers compare the possession of marihuana and its prohibition to the prohibition of murder, as though they're similar at all? You prefer a Governor General you've never met and probably will never influence to a Chief Justice you could call up and invite over for a coffee?

Well, there's no accouting for taste.
It's not like you're not part of a Ship of Fools---your Chief Justice as a Canadian is Beverly McLaughlin. Your Society has an executive with similar ability to grant or to not grant assent to Acts.

"Good luck with that clap trap but the reality is you are going to end up right back where you started at the end of that journey."

I don't think that's true.
Bud has already been acknowledged in Canada's Highest Court, Parliament, as Chief Justice of the Society.

Whether we are left to peacefully enact our will, that's another matter---but the Society has wished peace to Canada, and that is our position; Canada may continue to enforce its drug policy over the content of its membership; we are not within its membership.

As to your Sec. 56 exemption plan, cool---so then does every individual who wants one need to apply in respect of each drug? Further, as I take it your religious argument is partly grounded in the ancient use of plants, so how does that argument track onto newer semisynthetic psychedelics like LSD?
_________________________
vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas.
COR VNA VIA VNVM
"She's nobody's child. The Law can't touch her at all." --Dylan

Top
#1535528 - 05/16/09 11:14 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: OhYesWeCannabis!]
chrisbennett Offline

Ganja God
***

Registered: 06/21/00
Posts: 7136
Loc: Vancouver, BC
Gee and Bud was just winning me over with his former insatiable good will.
_________________________
Author www.forbiddenfruitpublishing.com, Shop Owner www.urbanshaman.net

Top
#1535530 - 05/16/09 11:24 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: Jack A. Roe]
chrisbennett Offline

Ganja God
***

Registered: 06/21/00
Posts: 7136
Loc: Vancouver, BC
Well I suppose one could almost form a cult around Tim Leary, Ram Dass, or other such sainty psychedelic figures. I don't believe in prohibition, but it is not an issue I am qualified to bring to the courts, I do how ever think I can offer something in the that way in regards to cannabis prohibition.
Although I have had what I would consider "enlightening" expereinces from LSD, these days I stick to plants and have for years.


Honestly Jack, I would be totally happy if what you say works out. I really don't understand it exactly, and that has a lot to do with my skepticism on the matter.... It seems "far-out". But if it brings about a situation where there is legal cannabis, I would be as happy about that as any of you, and i'd follow suite.



_________________________
Author www.forbiddenfruitpublishing.com, Shop Owner www.urbanshaman.net

Top
#1535533 - 05/16/09 11:36 AM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: OhYesWeCannabis!]
Jack A. Roe Offline
Stoner
*

Registered: 10/06/08
Posts: 511
Loc: The Land
"Maybe its your drivel causing the lower numbers?
I also spoke to the justice committee.....so what?"

"Words, Words, Words."
---Shak. Hamlet.

Parliament is Canada's Highest Court.
I mean, ultimately, one may say "so what?" to anything.

"again ....so what and big deal... who cares...unless it is really just about you bud in which case I would watch for less stars for you instead of more"

If Bud feels a slight bit prideful at what he has done, I believe he may be forgiven as that which he has undertaken is monumental in scope; he delivered Judgement to a room full of MPs. That takes Guts. I know plenty of people who aren't even comfortable speaking to a Crowd, let alone delivering judgement to and in the Highest Court of one of the world's "great Nations."

If what he says is funny, I imagine it appears funny because of the scale. Do you go to Provincial Court and bust a gut because they have a Unicorn up on the wall? That's the sort of thing a 12 year old girl has in her bedroom, right? You understand that Provincial Court Judges actually believe that they have the right to send men and women to jail for quasicriminal offences in respect of marihuana, right? And perhaps they do, within Canadian Society. That is not the only Society.

IMO Bud's involvement with this project is exemplary.
He has given his efforts without reward and without expectation thereof.

"Robin you caused this hahhahhahahhahha"

Bud's his own Man. I didn't cause anything. At best I offered him the opportunities and he accepted them of his own free will.

I will remind you that I first met Bud after he'd been arrested twice for asking cops to buy cannabis, that is, exercising his Right, albeit an unfortified Right.

In a sense, I surveyed the situation and have now erected an appropriate fortification of Bud's Right (which is really Our Right)---but without him, I am uncertain I'd ever have had such an opportunity to so do.
_________________________
vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas.
COR VNA VIA VNVM
"She's nobody's child. The Law can't touch her at all." --Dylan

Top
#1535543 - 05/16/09 12:24 PM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: OhYesWeCannabis!]
bud oracle Offline
Veteran
**

Registered: 06/05/08
Posts: 1309
Loc: Vancouver
"where do these guys come from????????"

Why from the stars.

What you did at the meeting was beg and you will be ignored, because they can ignore you.

We did something much better then that we included the entire room in our second parliament and now our record is verified by their record. Now no one can deny that what we said in our parliament jives with the official record. It's the form oh jealous one.

Like the current crop of nasty politicians you people run on vile slander and no substance.

Like my boss said we are lucky the Libs won. He was serious about moving to Alberta if the NDP had gotten in. Pragmatism beats out denigrating slander. And there is certainly pragmatism and quite a bit of sly humor involved in The registrar's handling of the spaceship Deuteronomy. much more innovative then the same swarmy commercial hempism I see so prevelent today.

Signed up 2 more happy people while writing this post. They wondered why all the fear and loathing, too?

Already got the day off for the second Parliament with a blessing from my boss.

When the fat Lady sings you'll finally have to admit that clowns are important too. And remember good things come from the stars.

Sorry Yes we Cannabis, it was not you I was thinking of when I made that spiteful remark. Sorry I was rude, but my defense is "I was provoked into it, Your Honor."


Edited by bud oracle (05/16/09 01:09 PM)

Top
#1535551 - 05/16/09 12:36 PM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: bud oracle]
TomatoPie Offline
Veteran
**

Registered: 04/30/09
Posts: 1202
Loc: Canada
Bud, from an unbiased view, I can say you come off exactly as that crackpot stoner the public loves to categorize any legalization activist in.

You may be doing good things for a good cause(or not, I'm not quite sure) but in the end it all comes down to "what the clown said". That's the final message being broadcast.

Top
#1535554 - 05/16/09 12:51 PM Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee [Re: TomatoPie]
Jack A. Roe Offline
Stoner
*

Registered: 10/06/08
Posts: 511
Loc: The Land
Quote:
Fool

That lord that counsell'd thee
To give away thy land,
Come place him here by me,
Do thou for him stand:
The sweet and bitter fool
Will presently appear;
The one in motley here,
The other found out there.

KING LEAR

Dost thou call me fool, boy?

Fool

All thy other titles thou hast given away; that
thou wast born with.

---Shak. King Lear Act I Scene IV

"Bud, from an unbiased view, I can say you come off exactly as that crackpot stoner the public loves to categorize any legalization activist in."

Is that unbiased?
I see, who are the other "legalization activists" who've said "so long" to Canada until they get their Act together?
_________________________
vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas.
COR VNA VIA VNVM
"She's nobody's child. The Law can't touch her at all." --Dylan

Top
Page 4 of 29 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28 29 >