|
5 registered (duthc, ineffable420, 3 invisible),
126
Guests and
43
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
38580 Members
55 Forums
183204 Topics
1648808 Posts
Max Online: 1054 @ 07/29/08 07:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
#1535445 - 05/16/09 01:03 AM
Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee
[Re: chrisbennett]
|
Veteran

Registered: 06/05/08
Posts: 1309
Loc: Vancouver
|
The wolf and I walked to the drive and strolled a bit tonight. Many people have been turned off by aspects of Christianity. There are few on a true quest for enlightenment.
The problem as it see it with your approach. You have been requesting/pursuing as have many others. With all due respect, this is "begging" on their turf, imo.
Can you not understand that we have, as is stated in our parliamentary record, and that of the house of commons, already achieved religious exemption by default. They recognized us in the official roles of our society. Bitta boom bitta bang! The form of it states that it is written officially, that we have given the government an ultimatum to which it has yet to respond officially or comply with one or the other demand/assertion.
We are in the process (its all about the process as someone in the OPCC once told me) of formally enacting a legal instrument in our legally recognized Society's Parliament which will put into effect our attempt to control and regulate these substances, as we have properly forewarned the Government of Canada we would. Check it out. It is history now. We are definitely not requesting anything of the Canadian Government. We have told them, and are telling them exactly what we will do, in proper form.
There is not a big difference between where you wish to go with your requests and pursuits and where we actually have come as a society, already. And examine your souls if something simple like personal belief is going to stand in the way of pragmatic solution.
You just have to step back a bit and see that it is only a legal instrument carved from the same tree as the legal instruments your are currently requesting and begging before.
By playing their game in their courts, you are putting yourself exactly under the jurisdiction of Deuteronomy, except you are layered with all the corporate statute bullshit too. So as you stand thinking your high personal religious convictions are intact, you are shooting yourself in the foot playing their game which claims to be based on exactly what you are rejecting here in our society, plus a little bit more (what you claim to be against--the CDSA).
Can't understand you, I truly can't! but of course I wish you well, Chris.
I am truly amazed at how myopic, contentious and limited the current state of activism is. Could it be that these "Activists" are really commercial entrepreneurs carving up and keeping their slice of the consumer market. Perhaps with a touch of Ego boosting Glory to reach for. Perhaps a little bit of media attention to feed the narcissistic tendencies inherent in such self serving creatures.
To pluck the golden ring of commercial success is so grand in the Canadian society. That's what The Drunk Driver ran on, pure fear of economic meltdown, as if he could actually do something to stave it off in a crumbling world economy. The NDP were running on an economic platform, too. the gall of these clever fraudsters and the idiocy of those who believed it never fails to amaze me.
The truth is that the majority of BC citizens stayed away from the charade, having recognized it as such.
And the same almost for Canadians in the general election. This is their strategy: turn off the majority and then all you have to do is get about 26-7% of the people to believe your crap. This is much easier than engaging the voters with real, well thought out policy designed with the safety of Canadians in mind, instead of receiving your power to rule from the USA.
Pocketing $300,000.00 in cash can be a reason to compromise one's ethics too, imo. Such pure bullshit is seen daily and still you suck on the tit of this corruption begging, requesting, pursuing. I can't figure it out, but then I might be affected be the LSD, or something.
Edited by bud oracle (05/16/09 02:03 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1535456 - 05/16/09 02:31 AM
Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee
[Re: chrisbennett]
|
Old hand

Registered: 12/17/04
Posts: 927
|
Well I do like Ecclesiastes and the Song of Songs and the Psalms, it aint all bad.
A logical ( Logos ), erotic ( Eros ) and pathetic ( Pathos ) literary collection of Extra Sensory Perceptions . To king (toking) the veil over the 420 sensi's that are numb (To flower or not to flower, that is the question.) to the Weird made Fresh, that is the Word made Flesh is the Most High's own section_56 exemption from the Flaw made Rich , that is the Law made Snitch . E cclesiastes S ong of Solomon P salms E-xtra (SOS) P-erceptions S erendipity O f S ynchronicity? In the rhetorical realm of ESP , Psalm 119 soars to stigmatizing heights, Most Highly sown! More so in the original Hebrew tongue it was numbered to conceive. There's a curious co-incidence in serendipity to that synchronicity of that 119 number that Psalm 119 is so named and numbered after, all by the names of the Hebrew-numbered "alphabet", it is ascribed as. Basically a song of praise and honour of "GOD'S WORD". There are exactly 119 scriptural references in the KJV Bible where the words God and word appear together in verse. In other words, (g!) the other-worldly "words" God and word appear together in precisely 119 Bible references. I wonder if the "O" in Be Tween those two "S's in the acronym and initialism of "SOS", that the "weird-word" imagery is spiritually parallel to the staff that those two "S's" are spiraling around in the Caduceus ?  Further wondering... AND ... If the Word of GOD were compressed into the Most HIGH file format, what would it look like? May be DNA... AND Be! 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1535466 - 05/16/09 05:01 AM
Re: A Trip to the House Justice Committee
[Re: chrisbennett]
|
Old hand

Registered: 12/17/04
Posts: 927
|
So one has a right to hold a nuclear weapon?
No more or less so than One, two, Buckle my shoe. Three, Four, Open the door. Five, Six, Pick up sticks. Seven, Eight, Lay them straight. Nine, Ten, A big fat Hen. Eleven, twelve, Mind your self (or, roast er well). Thirteen, fourteen, maids are sporting. Fifteen, sixteen, maids are kissing. Seventeen, eighteen, maids are waiting. Nineteen, twenty, maids are plenty. Twenty-one, twenty-two, If you love me as I love you My knife can cut our love in two. Twenty-three, twenty-four, Mary at the kitchen door Eating apples by the score. One, two, three, four.... has the right to hold the whole world in His Hands. Just on a WHIM high tot, "So one has the right to hold a WMD"? Does one have the right to the Rings of Power? Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky, Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone, Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die, One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne, In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. That One Ring "to rule them all" that Sauron made suggests the power is forged Tyranny, aka false laws in place like Prohibition Complex (CDSA?) and related Police State context of DEAland enforcement by their network of "wraiths" etc. Nazgūl, undercover cops, snitches, informants and all that power the ONE Ring uses. Tom Bombadil, what a dilly of a name btw, probably wears a weird hat, you know. The weird made fresh! Why didn't the One Ring have any Control Over Tom Bombadil? Tom Bombadil is an enigma in Middle-earth; we do not know what he is and his origin is never revealed. Tolkien did state in one of his letters that Tom had been created long before he thought about writing the Lord of the Rings and he put him in because he wanted an adventure for the hobbits along the way to Rivendell. For all that, Tolkien did use Tom to make a statement about the nature of power and domination. Tom is supposed to represent an existence whose key desire is in understanding ONLY. He is not concerned in using this understanding for any purpose. As such power and domination are completely useless to him and have no meaning or effect upon him. "He is master in a peculiar way: he has no fear, and no desire of possession or domination at all. He merely knows and understands about such things as concern him in his natural little realm. [He represents] the spirit that desires knowledge of other things, their history and nature... and entirely unconcerned with `doing' anything with the knowledge..." [Letters #153) "Could we not still send messages to him and obtain his help? asked Erestor. It seems that he has a power even over the Ring. No, I should not put it so, said Gandalf. Say rather that the Ring has no power over him. He is his own master. But he cannot alter the Ring itself, nor break its power over others..." [FR] The Ring cannot effect Tom Bombadil because he is outside the whole issue of Power and Domination; Tolkien uses Tom as an allegory that even this intense struggle between "good and evil" is only part of the whole picture of existence.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BongPixie, CaliGrower, chrisbennett, Dana Larsen, FranCouver, Fred_the_Plumber, frmrgrl, goodster, jacob, JodieEmery, Marc Scott Emery, MICHY, OCNORML, puff_tuff, stinkweed
|