I give a shit because Firefighters like Boyle are first Hand witnesses and say "Building 7 had a huge hole right in the middle of it, about 20 stories tall and on fire inside. That's why 7 fell.


Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.

http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/mag...e/gz/boyle.html

None of your firefighter quotes explain how a hole on the SIDE of a building results in the building falling STRAIGHT DOWN.

No, it explains how a hole, "probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it",might result in the building falling STRAIGHT DOWN.


New video shows the gash on the south side of building 7.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U&...player_embedded

"No, it explains how a hole, "probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it",might result in the building falling STRAIGHT DOWN."

It's the middle of the SIDE of the building, not the middle of the actual building.

In this video you can hear the firefighter say,"There is a hole in that building, seven alarm, its's going to come down!"



New video shows the gash on the south side of building 7.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U&...player_embedded

When there is a structural fire an alarm is sounded. Most departments send a designated number of engines and or trucks on a response. We would send 3 engines and 1 truck and 1 battalion chief. On a second alarm there would be an additional 3 engines, 1 truck, 2 battalion chiefs and 1 deputy chief. On a third there would be 3 more engines, On a fourth 3 more engines. So on a 7th alarm fire you would have a total of 21 engines, 2 trucks, unless additional trucks were called, 3 battalion chiefs, and 1 deputy chief.

"... the gash on the south side of building 7"

Keep that "destruction was on the SIDE of the building" evidence coming ... you're not helping your "straight down collapse" argument any.





"So on a 7th alarm fire you would have a total of 21 engines, 2 trucks, unless additional trucks were called, 3 battalion chiefs, and 1 deputy chief."

None of this explains the symmetrical collapse. Uncontrolled collapses cannot possibly be symmetrical.

Both north & south towers collapsed straight down.
To say that Firefighters would blow up a burning building and risk killing people is industrial strength stupid and the stuff of internet conspiracy websites!




www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U&...player_embedded

I find it hilarious that firemen (unseen btw)planted 150 tons of explosives in to bring it down is simpler than what we saw on live tv.

Controlled demolitions start at the bottom and work their way UP a building.

OCCAM'S RAZOR, use it.

All the things that would have to have happen in order for your conspiracy theory to work is too complicated to actually be practical.

K.I.S.S.-keep it simple, stupid

"To say that Firefighters would blow up a burning building and risk killing people is industrial strength stupid and the stuff of internet conspiracy websites!"

Where do I say firefighters blow up the building?

All that is required is that one of the head firefighters is part of the old boys club ... the guys who place the explosives is probably some sort of special ops branch of the military - the same group of assassins who kill politicians that get in the way of the powers that be.

"Controlled demolitions start at the bottom and work their way UP a building."

That's exactly how WTC 7 fell ... from the bottom up.

There's no reason why the WTC 1 and 2 buildings could have broken convention and fell from the top down if they re-arranged the explosion sequences.


"OCCAM'S RAZOR, use it."

I have used it ... the simplest explanation as to why three skyscrapers melted from fire on this one day and no other was that it wasn't just fire.