I can imagine that you are busy with Activism related things. I understand you are a busy person. Perhaps you could appeal to some forum members to act in your interest and in the interest of the Cannibus Community as a whole and to take an interest in these Wikipedia Entries.

It's apparent that you Don't give much credit to the Wikipedia, but many many people consider it a valid information source if not a research tool to be used in the same manner as any printed encyclopedia.

I haven't read your Wikipedia entry. I honestly don't know shit about your political views or your views on Homosexuality aside from whats been posted in this thread. But I can tell you that the Wikipedia is a respected entity on the Internet and that the way your Bio might read today could be much different than how it reads tomorrow. Thats the beauty of a Wiki. Its a constantly changing thing.

I for one am going to register with Wikipedia and will be keeping an eye on some of these topics and I will attempt to make edits to what is improperly represented within the next week. The important thing to note is that ANYONE can do that. So Anyone who has info for the Wiki may add to it.

Now that you are aware of this information's presence on the web (and its supremely high ranking in Google Searches, which BTW is because of the nature of the Google Search Engine and not through an arrangement between the two) you might consider simply checking on it every once an a while to see that it is at least reflecting you partially correctly. You aren't ever gonna be 100% happy with it because people are never gonna be 100% happy with YOU. But i think you get the idea.

Lets keep our Orwell lessons straight here.


First. I use the term diviant to describe homosexuals, transexuals, sexual sadists and sexual masochists.

You keep saying "abnormal" in place of diviant, so it is you reading evil into what I said. When psychologists speak of all this sex stuff, what word do they use?

Different is not the word that is used. Diviant is....especially in the biology books.

Well, I'm sure the Libertarians could come up with better representation that me to speak at any events, the point being that I don't fear diviants.


I pulled the 99% out of one of Szasz's books where I learned these arguments.

That 10% of the population is homosexual is pulled from out of thin air. Masters and Johson came up with that figure in the 60's based on some kind of bogus studies like the rest of their stuff.

Sex by Prescription by Thomas Szasz pretty well blows everything Masters and Johnson had to say out of the water. In reailty town a very small percentage of the population engages in homosexual acts. 1%, 2% tops. Only 17% of the population smokes cannabis. I know a lot more cannabis users than homosexuals. There is no reason for them to be in the closet for the last 30 years. They would be everywhere if the 10% figure held water.

Now about this word "homophobic." Gee it's a good thing I know my Szasz eh. That is a made up word.

Really clever too. Makes it sound as if the target of the accusation has some kind of disease eh! Medicalized moral is what that is. What word can you associate with me for avoiding the acceptance of the dominixtress?

Am I a dominophobe?

Am I a sadiophobe?

Am I a masophobe?

Am I a scatophobe?

So you see any kind of behavior can be medicalized.

Explain to me what the difference is between not wanting to associte with a homosexual person as opposed to not wanting to associate with a dominixtress? And still yet, what is the difference between not wanting to hang out with homosexuals and not wanting to hang out with those who love scat?

People who are involved in scat are after all, just normal human beings like me and you right?

Same with wanting to tie up or be tied up for sexual gratification....all normal stuff right?


Most people like a bit of spanking. That is revealing and I doubt that statement holds water either.

Personally I don't like striking others.

I don't see any of this as having anything to do with race.

Has to do with sexual preferance and choosing associates.

To me it's like the Hutterites. I don't hate them, I don't want to be hanging with any of them either. So I must be a Huteritophobe too. I don't hang out at any religious institutions because I disagree with that lifestyle to.

Am I a Cathilicophobe?

What I see from your rantings is that you too would prefer regimented thought. I believe I will pass.

The regimentation of ideas is even more repugnant to me than the scatologists.

Pleasure drug users are diviants. The vast majority do not use drugs for pleasure. When the sociologists are discussing illegal drug use do you suppose they use the word "different?"

Read "Sex by Prescription" before you buy into all that junk science out there on the net.

Biologic diviant are not the same thing as Biblical deviants.

I have been hit on by 7 maybe 8 homosexuals in my life. I pleasently told them to get lost. I really don't fear a hell of a lot.

Alice Cooper said it best. See, when I think of some guy wanting to suck my dick...."It makes my skin crawl." Worse the idea some guy wanting me to suck his dick....well that makes my skin crawl too. Sorry.

I wish I could be politcally correct about all of that but then I would be lying to myself. No amount of scientific studies will get me to believe that is normal behavior.

Nothing I have said implies that I think homosexuals are "different" than any other human being. They bleed red.

That's why I object to words like different instead of diviant.

The deeper fear of "liking it" is hardly the motivation for my non-acceptance of homosexuality as normal.

The arguments put forth, that one guy sucking another guys dick is normal, ....man that dog just don't hunt!

what's your stand on hermaphrodites?

if i were standing next to hally berre, a gay guy would rather bang me than her is why i think they have no choice over their orientation, any hetro, no matter how fucked in the head they might be, will pick hally, i bet anything.

I would prefer not to have sex with a shemale I suppose.

And good to see that "classification" and moral judgement are two different catagories.

It takes all kinds to make the world go round. There is plenty of room for everybody.


Hermaphrodites would be a biologic classification.

Like I said, my thoughts tend to revolve around the blond haired blued eyed females of which Winnipeg has an over abundance. I have no ambition or secret desires.

I'm 47. Think Barbara Eden and Elizabeth Montgomery when you wonder what I would consider sexy and desirable. They are old ladies now but their equilivent abound. And for that I am greatful!

[quote

Like I said, my thoughts tend to revolve around the blond haired blued eyed females of which Winnipeg has an over abundance. I have no ambition or secret desires.

I'm 47. Think Barbara Eden and Elizabeth Montgomery when you wonder what I would consider sexy and desirable. They are old ladies now but their equilivent abound. And for that I am greatful!

---

yes but you would pick halle over me right?

you would pick madeline albright over me!

why? because you are a hetrosexual and nothing is going to change that, right?

what makes you think that that staunchness isn't an inherent trait of hetrosexuality? every hetro i know would pick her over me if they were forced.

i know nothing can change me, how about you chris?

well then where do gays come from if they're not born? from converted hetros? is it reasonable to think perhaps hetros who can be converted were never really hetros to begin with?

just the fact that these type of questions can be raised, says that nothing is difinitive, so what ever you may chose to believe or formulate an opinion on, you cannot yourself accept as fact that there is only one orientation-hetrosexual and anything else is a diviation from that.

there is no way you can accept that as fact, no matter how strong your opinion about it may be.

If one were forced to pick then what differnce would it make?

Why is this Halle Berry a shemale?


Why not make the choice of a midget or twiggy who I always thought looked like death warmed over. Someone buy the girl a meal.

There is some sort of logical failicy to be arguing the man in the lifebat scene as if those circumstances were applicable to real life.

There is always to choice to die before having sex with anybody you don't want to have sex with and that would likely be my choice. Death before dishonor type of thing.