Mr Hand

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of

5,196 posts in this topic

Inconvenient Question: Gore asked about failed ’10-year tipping’ point – Refuses to answer, enters SUV in snow

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tyson is a bought and paid for corporate shill.  His science shows about the universe are for the most part scientifically valid, very educating and quite entertaining.  His little video about how he equates modern foods derived by selective breeding over centuries to GE foods is showing of his true nature.

For sale to the highest bidder!

Neil DeGrasse Tyson on gmo food.

:peace:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data 

 

 

  • The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
  • It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
  • America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
  • The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data

By David Rose for The Mail on Sunday

PUBLISHED: 17:57 EST, 4 February 2017 UPDATED: 10:12 EST, 5 February 2017

 

 


3CD7498B00000578-4192182-image-a-60_1486

Data Science,Climate and satellites Consultant John J Bates, who blew the whistle to the Mail on Sunday

 

 

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4Xsz5KqBN 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

I started this thread on  Feb 5 2007.

Today is Feb 5 2017 exactly ten years to get to the final nail in the coffin and put this man made global warming scam to rest!

Edited by Mr Hand
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump Just Ordered for Complete ELIMINATION of 16 EPA Global Warming Programs

The White House is pushing for significant cuts to EPA programs and staff levels, giving a glimpse of how the Trump administration plans on devolving more control to the states.

The budget plan sent from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to EPA leadership calls for eliminating dozens of programs, including at least 16 that have to do with global warming and implementing former President Barack Obama’s climate agenda.

 

http://www.youngcons.com/trump-just-ordered-for-complete-elimination-of-16-epa-global-warming-programs/

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering (2017)

https://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/

 

World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

 

Global warming world map based largely on “fake science”

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-02-05-global-warming-world-map-fake-science-noaa-caught-in-blatant-temperature-data-fraud.html

 

Whistle-Blower: 'Global Warming' Data Manipulated

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/05/whistle-blower-global-warming-data-manipulated-paris-conference/

 

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation (2009)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html

Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'? (2009)

http://web.archive.org/web/20091122160941/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

 

Climate change emails between scientists reveal flaws in peer review

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaws-peer-review

 

'Climate emails hacked by spies'

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/climate-emails-hacked-by-spies-1885147.html

Climategate: the man-made global warming hoaX

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greenland's Coastal Ice Passed a Climate Tipping Point 20 Years Ago, Study Says

Faster-than-expected melting of Greenland's ice fields is worrisome news for the fate of the larger ice sheet, and subsequent sea level rise.

BY BOB BERWYN, INSIDECLIMATE NEWS

MAR 31, 2017
Greenland3GettyImages.jpg?itok=payqhDkZ

Credit: Uriel Sinai/Getty Images

Ice caps and glaciers along the coast of Greenland passed a tipping point in 1997, when a layer of snow that once absorbed summer meltwater became fully saturated. Since then, the coastal ice fields—separate from the main Greenland Ice Sheet—have been melting three times faster than they had been, according to a new study published Friday in the journal Nature Communications.

 

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/31032017/-climate-change-science-greenland-global-warming-ice-melt

 

 

 

MARCH 31 2017

'Completely unlivable': Climate change pushing humans, other species to the brink

 
 

Human societies and a multitude of species are going to be tested by climate change in ways that are barely understood, a wide-ranging study involving researchers from 44 institutions around the world has found.

Species in every ecosystem are being affected by rising temperatures and shifting rainfall patterns, with marine animals moving poleward at the average pace of 72 kilometres and land-based ones 17 kilometres a decade, according to the paper published on Friday in the journal Science.

Malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases are spreading as temperatures warm. Malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases are spreading as temperatures warm. Photo: AP

"Movement of mosquitoes in response to global warming is a threat to health in many countries through predicted increases in the number of known, and potentially new, diseases," the paper found, noting malaria is already a risk for about half of humanity, with more than 200 million cases recorded in 2014 alone.

Food security is also at risk from the spread of plant pathogens and other pests.

"This is going to impact on a lot more than you think," said Stephen Williams, a rainforest ecologist and one of the paper's authors.

While some species can adapt by moving either to higher ground or cooler waters, not all can. Human populations, too, are limited in how they can move, depending on how tightly national boundaries are enforced.

"[T]he relative immobility of many human societies, largely imposed by jurisdictional borders, has limited capacity to respond to environmental change by migration," the paper said.

While Australia is known for its fluctuating weather, particularly rainfall, more extreme conditions will challenge many human and animal communities alike. "We're going way outside the boundaries of our natural variability ... more than we appreciate," Professor Williams said.

Four hours above 29 degrees and a lemuroid ringtail possum will likely perish. Four hours above 29 degrees and a lemuroid ringtail possum will likely perish. Photo: Wet Tropics Management Authority.

He cited lemuroid ringtail possums that inhabit the wet tropics rainforests and will die if exposed to just four hours of 29-degree temperatures.

Heatwaves, if they coincide with dry conditions with little mist or cloud, "can literally crash a population in a number of days", Professor Williams said. "Suddenly it becomes completely unlivable."

The UN is seeking $US4.4 billion by the end of March to prevent catastrophic hunger and famine in South Sudan, Nigeria, ... The UN is seeking $US4.4 billion by the end of March to prevent catastrophic hunger and famine in South Sudan, Nigeria, Somalia and Yemen. Photo: WFP/AP

The shifting of the range of creatures poses challenges for conservation efforts not least because endangered species may exit areas set aside for their protection as they seek more hospitable habitat.

"Under climate change, everything is very dynamic and moving," Professor Williams said.

The biologically rich giant kelp forests off eastern Tasmania are under threat from warm-water predators. The biologically rich giant kelp forests off eastern Tasmania are under threat from warm-water predators. Photo: Craig Sanderson

In some cases, a threatened species will enter a region where it wasn't previously found, becoming "an invading species where by law it must be exterminated", he said.

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions "removes the root cause" of the problem. In the case of tropical rainforests, the number of species expected to disappear will drop from about 60 per cent by the end of the century under business-as-usual emissions to as few as 5 per cent. "It will make a really big difference," he said.

On-going monitoring is needed to track how species are moving, including across state or national boundaries. The collected evidence is limited and, in some cases, being interrupted by funding cuts.

"[L]ong-term datasets for biological systems are rare, and recent trends of declining funding undermine the viability of monitoring programs required to document and respond to climate change," the paper found.

Researchers in a range of Australian programs are awaiting news of their fate, with the federal government due to announce within weeks the next round of funding for the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS).

A Senate inquiry into oceans and climate change heard this month from scientists concerned programs such as the monitoring of the East Australian Current might be at risk.

"We have had this 70-year history of recording temperature and salinity off Sydney, and some smaller arrays off Narooma, on the South Coast [of NSW], Iain Suthers, an oceanographer at the University of NSW told the inquiry. "If that funding were to cease, we would be left absolutely blind as to the strength and changes of that East Australian Current."

 

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/completely-unlivable-climate-change-pushing-humans-other-species-to-the-brink-20170330-gv9v7g.html

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: Believing CO2 controls the climate ‘is pretty close to believing in magic’

 

Lindzen: "Doubling CO2 involves a 2% perturbation to this budget. So do minor changes in clouds and other features, and such changes are common. In this complex multifactor system, what is the likelihood of the climate (which, itself, consists in many variables and not just globally averaged temperature anomaly) is controlled by this 2% perturbation in a single variable? Believing this is pretty close to believing in magic. Instead, you are told that it is believing in ‘science.’ Such a claim should be a tip-off that something is amiss. After all, science is a mode of inquiry rather than a belief structure."

"The accumulation of false and/or misleading claims is often referred to as the ‘overwhelming evidence’ for forthcoming catastrophe. Without these claims, one might legitimately ask whether there is any evidence at all."

 

http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/05/01/mit-climate-scientist-dr-richard-lindzen-believing-co2-controls-the-climate-is-pretty-close-to-believing-in-magic/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For almost 70 years the U.S. government has subsidized the fossil fuel industry; a very conservative estimate is more than $700 billion over that time period. Not surprisingly, given this massive “corporate welfare,” our entire infrastructure is currently based on use of these fuels and remains addicted to them for its continuing efficacy.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-energy-and-climate-policy-denial-and-delusion_us_59037ec5e4b084f59b49f8a6

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/21/2017 at 8:00 AM, davidmalmolevine said:

For almost 70 years the U.S. government has subsidized the fossil fuel industry; a very conservative estimate is more than $700 billion over that time period. Not surprisingly, given this massive “corporate welfare,” our entire infrastructure is currently based on use of these fuels and remains addicted to them for its continuing efficacy.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-energy-and-climate-policy-denial-and-delusion_us_59037ec5e4b084f59b49f8a6

 

Everything runs on oil. Most everything you and I own is made of oil. The moment you obtained those oil produced items you became an part of the loop David. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Everything runs on oil. Most everything you and I own is made of oil. The moment you obtained those oil produced items you became an part of the loop David."

 

Oil is heavily subsidized, because it's monopolizable. The moment those subsidies end, so does the rule of the petro-lords. 

 

 

Some of the largest, most profitable companies in Canada are collectively receiving an estimated $3.3 billion in subsidies every year from Canadian taxpayers, according to a new analysis.

The report, released today by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, a Canadian-based think tank, outlines how billions in federal and provincial tax breaks and corporate incentives benefit companies in the oil and gas sector like Imperial Oil, whose earnings in 2015 were CDN$1.1 billion.

https://www.desmog.ca/2016/08/30/canadian-taxpayers-fork-out-3.3-billion-every-year-super-profitable-oil-companies

 

 

A 2013 report published by the International Monetary Fund concluded that global fossil fuel subisides amount to $1.9 trillion annually.  $1.4 trillion of this is due to externalities, $800 billion due to climate change.  This estimate is based on a conservative social cost of carbon of $25 per tonne of CO2 emitted.  An arguably more realistic estimate of $100 per tonne of CO2 would bring global fossil fuel subsidies to over $4 trillion per year, with $3.2 trillion due to climate change.

In a report published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Epstein et al. (2011) do a full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal, taking these externalities into account.  Among the factors included in this analysis were:

  • government coal subsidies
  • increased illness and mortality due to mining pollution
  • climate change from greenhouse gas emissions
  • particulates causing air pollution
  • loss of biodiversity
  • cost to taxpayers of environmental monitoring and cleanup
  • decreased property values
  • infrastructure damages from mudslides resulting from mountaintop removal
  • infrastructure damage from mine blasting
  • impacts of acid rain resulting from coal combustion byproducts
  • water pollution

Most of these external factors do not apply to most renewable energy sources. 

 

https://skepticalscience.com/renewable-energy-is-too-expensive.htm

 

 

The only question remains ... are you some country bumpkin fuck nut who is too dense to understand the above ... or are you some oil industry shill, who has betrayed the human race for thirty pieces of silver? Either way, you might take this opportunity to re-think your life choices. 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Oil is heavily subsidized, because it's monopolizable. The moment those subsidies end, so does the rule of the petro-lords. "

 

  Stop buy things made from oil. You are the problem.

 

A partial list of products made from Petroleum (144 of 6000 items) 

One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest (over half) is used to make things like:

Solvents

Diesel fuel

Motor Oil

Bearing Grease

Ink

Floor Wax

Ballpoint Pens

Football Cleats

Upholstery

Sweaters

Boats

Insecticides

Bicycle Tires

Sports Car Bodies

Nail Polish

Fishing lures

Dresses

Tires

Golf Bags

Perfumes

Cassettes

Dishwasher parts

Tool Boxes

Shoe Polish

Motorcycle Helmet

Caulking

Petroleum Jelly

Transparent Tape

CD Player

Faucet Washers

Antiseptics

Clothesline

Curtains

Food Preservatives

Basketballs

Soap

Vitamin Capsules

Antihistamines

Purses

Shoes

Dashboards

Cortisone

Deodorant

Footballs

Putty

Dyes

Panty Hose

Refrigerant

Percolators

Life Jackets

Rubbing Alcohol

Linings

Skis

TV Cabinets

Shag Rugs

Electrician's Tape

Tool Racks

Car Battery Cases

Epoxy

Paint

Mops

Slacks

Insect Repellent

Oil Filters

Umbrellas

Yarn

Fertilizers

Hair Coloring

Roofing

Toilet Seats

Fishing Rods

Lipstick

Denture Adhesive

Linoleum

Ice Cube Trays

Synthetic Rubber

Speakers

Plastic Wood

Electric Blankets

Glycerin

Tennis Rackets

Rubber Cement

Fishing Boots

Dice

Nylon Rope

Candles

Trash Bags

House Paint

Water Pipes

Hand Lotion

Roller Skates

Surf Boards

Shampoo

Wheels

Paint Rollers

Shower Curtains

Guitar Strings

Luggage

Aspirin

Safety Glasses

Antifreeze

Football Helmets

Awnings

Eyeglasses

Clothes

Toothbrushes

Ice Chests

Footballs

Combs

CD's & DVD's

Paint Brushes

Detergents

Vaporizers

Balloons

Sun Glasses

Tents

Heart Valves

Crayons

Parachutes

Telephones

Enamel

Pillows

Dishes

Cameras

Anesthetics

Artificial Turf

Artificial limbs

Bandages

Dentures

Model Cars

Folding Doors

Hair Curlers

Cold cream

Movie film

Soft Contact lenses

Drinking Cups

Fan Belts

Car Enamel

Shaving Cream

Ammonia

Refrigerators

Golf Balls

Toothpaste

Gasoline

Americans consume petroleum products at a rate of three-and-a-half gallons of oil and more than 
250 cubic feet of natural gas per day each! But, as shown here petroleum is not just used for fuel.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hydrocarbons contain the two elements carbon and hydrogen (hence the name).
Carbohydrates also contain carbon and hydrogen. However they also contain
oxygen. So if you can make something from a hydrocarbon you should be
able, in theory, to make it from a carbohydrate by just removing the oxygen
from it.

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.chem/sG-wGhIdBt8

 

The reason it's cheaper and easier to use oil instead of hemp is that oil is subsidized with billions of tax payer dollars, and hemp is over-regulated or outright prohibited. 

 

If hemp were subsidized and the health and environmental costs were factored into the cost of each product, oil products would be quickly replaced with hemp products. 

 

http://www.voteindustrialhemp.com/

 

http://hemp-ethanol.blogspot.ca/2008/01/economics-history-and-politics-of-hemp.html

 

https://www.medicaljane.com/2015/01/14/the-differences-between-hemp-and-cannabis/

 

https://books.google.ca/books?id=wGajTK3Ji_EC&pg=PT218&lpg=PT218&dq=anything+that+can+be+made+from+a+hydrocarbon+can+be+made+from+a+carbohydrate&source=bl&ots=0IGmPWtNwV&sig=bbCNAYgQbtbtImctkOEarTeFBFk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7qo7jyefUAhUJ_WMKHS14CiAQ6AEIPDAD#v=onepage&q=anything that can be made from a hydrocarbon can be made from a carbohydrate&f=false

 

 

 

It's funny that you keep posting up oil industry propaganda on a hemp discussion forum for decades. Somebody must be paying you. 

 

Keep ignoring news like this - otherwise you might go fucking insane and kill yourself: 

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/world-climate-change-save-humanity-experts-global-warming-rising-sea-levels-food-a7813251.html?cmpid=facebook-post

 

 

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bombshell’ climate-change study could totally dismantle the claim humans are causing global warming

 

https://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/climate-protesters.jpg

 

A new peer-reviewed study by scientists and a statistician claims to reveal that “nearly all” of the warming shown in current temperature datasets from NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Met Office in the United Kingdom are the result of adjustments made to the datasets after temperatures were recorded, calling into question just how much warming is real and how much is pure fantasy.

In the report, titled “On the Validity of NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU Global Average Surface Temperature Data and the Validity of EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Finding,” authors James P. Wallace III, Joseph S. D’Aleo and Craig Idso examine the accuracy of global average surface temperature data.

“The objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data, produced by NOAA, NASA, and HADLEY, are sufficiently credible estimates of global average temperatures such that they can be relied upon for climate modeling and policy analysis purposes,” the authors wrote.

Many people misunderstand how global temperature is calculated. As the authors of the study note, GAST data is not simply the raw temperature recordings. Rather, the data is adjusted after it is recorded to account for various problems, such as “contamination by urbanization.” Because many temperature recordings come from urban areas, where numerous factors affect temperature readings, they need to be adjusted to more accurately reflect the true temperature.

 

Critics of the most widely used global average surface temperature datasets have said they think these adjustments have been exaggerated to favor the view humans are causing climate change.

To test the validity of the GAST data adjustments, the researchers examined other historical data and known cyclical patterns to determine whether the adjustments were appropriate.

“As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data,” the authors wrote. “This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts.”

The researchers concluded based on their study that “the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality.”

“The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality,” the authors wrote. “In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever — despite current claims of record setting warming.”

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, who co-authored the study, said to the Daily Caller News Foundation.“Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

“You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,” D’Aleo said.

The noted climate-skeptic website Watts Up With That? called the study a “bombshell.”

If the researchers’ findings are accurate, it would mean that the global temperature data most often used to show increasing temperatures are potentially not accurate and that the true global temperature is likely lower than is currently reported, further undermining climate-change alarmists’ claims.

 

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/07/09/bombshell-climate-change-study-could-totally-dismantle-the-claim-humans-are-causing-global-warming/

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be moot - renewables might just outcompete non-renewables, regardless of what people feel about climate destabilization: 

 

Wind, solar to be cheapest form of power generation by 2030: Study

 
UPDATED: JUL 07, 2017, 08.18 PM IST
Post a Comment
 

NEW DELHI: Wind energy and solar power will be the cheapest form of power generation in every G20 country, including India, by the year 2030, a study today said. 

With the G20 summit underway in Hamburg today, the study carried out by Greenpeace Germany said in about half of the G20 countries, renewable energy has been cheaper or equal in price to electricity generated from dirty coal or hazardous nuclear power plants since 2015. 

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/power/wind-solar-to-be-cheapest-form-of-power-generation-by-2030-study/articleshow/59492895.cms

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/9/2017 at 10:07 PM, davidmalmolevine said:

Could be moot - renewables might just outcompete non-renewables, regardless of what people feel about climate destabilization: 

 

Wind, solar to be cheapest form of power generation by 2030: Study

 
UPDATED: JUL 07, 2017, 08.18 PM IST
Post a Comment
 

NEW DELHI: Wind energy and solar power will be the cheapest form of power generation in every G20 country, including India, by the year 2030, a study today said. 

With the G20 summit underway in Hamburg today, the study carried out by Greenpeace Germany said in about half of the G20 countries, renewable energy has been cheaper or equal in price to electricity generated from dirty coal or hazardous nuclear power plants since 2015. 

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/power/wind-solar-to-be-cheapest-form-of-power-generation-by-2030-study/articleshow/59492895.cms

 

 

Sounds like someone will be making a lot of toxic batteries. This is amazing David!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/15/2017 at 11:58 AM, Mr Hand said:

 

 

Sounds like someone will be making a lot of toxic batteries. This is amazing David!

Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

 

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-15/research-team-slams-global-warming-data-new-report-not-reality-totally-inconsistent-

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now